Click to access RSS





























































































































To find an archived article, simply click on Index and scroll the subject titles, or do a Ctrl-F search


This archive, organized into months, and indexed by
time and alphabet,
contains all issues since inception, including the current week.

You can write to me at blog2-at-tallrite-dot-com
(Clumsy form of my address to thwart spamming software that scans for e-mail addresses)

Ill-informed and Objectionable Comment by an anonymous reader

September 2009


ISSUE #196 - 13th September 2009

Kostenlose Uhr fur die Seite clock for blog

Date & Time in Westernmost Europe

Just for fun, the latest Rasmussen poll on President Barack Obama's popularity will
from now on be published at the head of the Tallrite Blog. The date is on the chart.
Rasmussen Daily Poll - 12 September 2009

ISSUE #196 - 13th September 2009 [334+481=815]


Has Gordon Brown Become Anti-British?


Lisbon Slogans and Platitudes


Irish Senior Citizens Parliament and Lisbon


Clean Water Instantly


Issue 196’s Comment to Cyberspace


Quotes for Issue 196

Has Gordon Brown Become Anti-British?

In the US, some of the wilder conservatives question not only whether President Obama is American (there is evidence he was born in British Kenya, the land of his father and he refuses to produce his original birth certificate) but whether he is even pro-America.  Such accusations were partly the reason he reluctantly resumed wearing an American lapel badge. 

I am beginning to wonder the same about the ever more manic, pill-popping Gordon Brown - is he pro British?

 Guido Fawke's manic, pill-popping Gordon Brown

His recent behaviour vis-à-vis Libya puts this in serious doubt. 

Let's recap. 

Libya's vicious, megalomaniac, economically incompetent, terrorist-supporting dictator has been in power for forty years, since as a young officer in the army Moammar Gadaffi seized the leadership from King Idris in a coup d'état on 1st September 1969.  (I remember it well - I was living there.  To my dismay he quickly shut down all the bars, casinos and nightclubs which made Tripoli such a great place for a young man.) 

Who killed whom in Northern IrelandThroughout the 1970s and 1980s one of the terrorist groups he supported was the IRA, supplying them with countless small and large guns, vast amounts of ammunition and tons of explosives.  This matériel ended up killing (and maiming) hundreds of British soldiers, policemen and civilians, along with even more Irish citizens.

Libya was rightly classified as a terrorist-supporting state. 

But something not unrelated to 9-11 happened in 2003: George W Bush invaded Iraq to depose Saddam Hussein.  Colonel Gaddafi observed the violent downfall of a fellow terrorist-supporting Arab dictator and drew a rational conclusion.  With a firm eye on his own mortality, he rang up prime minister Bersluconi of Italy, the former colonial power, and confessed

I will do whatever the Americans want,
because I saw what happened in Iraq, and I was afraid

Pervez Musharraf, military dictator of Pakistan, had also reckoned it was better to be with America than against it.  So in early 2004, prodded by the US, he unmasked AQ Khan as not only the hitherto revered father of Pakistan's successful nuclear weapons programme, but also a prolific exporter - for money - of nuclear technology to rogue states including North Korea, Iran and ... Libya. 

It was against this backdrop that, in December 2003, Col Gadaffi suddenly renounced his weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programmes and welcomed international inspectors to Libya to verify this. 


The only other state ever to have done this was South Africa as part of its laudable transition from apartheid to true democracy.

It was personal self-preservation and American aggression that were the the Colonel's motivator, not some kind of Damascene conversion to pacifism, much as the West might like to feign that a new commitment to good behaviour is part of its stunning success over Libya's WMD.  Why, we even want to pretend he has joined the war on terror!  Yeah, right. 

But Col Gadaffi remains as devoted to fomenting trouble as he ever was and remains a dedicated anti-West Islamist.  He has just become more more clever and subtle about it, as this statement of his about the explosive rise in Islamic populations within Europe reveals (minute 3-3½ in this Youtube clip):

There are signs that Allah will grant victory in Europe without swords, without guns, without conquests.  The fifty million Muslims of Europe will turn it into an Islamic continent within a few decades.   

Germany's is the first European government to admit that the relentless rise in its Muslim population is unstoppable, with the likely result of Germany becoming a Muslim majority state by 2050.  Indeed, the expectation is that the total across Europe will double in just twenty years.  So Col Gadaffi realises he doesn't need terrorists or suicide-homicide bombers to achieve his Islamist ends.   

So against this backdrop, how can anyone explain the bizarre kowtowing to Col Gadaffi by Britain under Gordon Brown?  The recent revelations are astounding:


Britain has released the Libyan Islamist terrorist Abdelbaset Al Megrahi from a life sentence imposed for his part in mass-murdering 270 innocent souls, by planting a bomb on a Pan Am airliner which exploded over Lockerbie in 1988.  He was the worst criminal incarcerated in Britain.  So how many more people than 270 does Britain require you to slaughter before a life sentence means life? 


He was released on supposedly compassionate grounds because he is supposedly suffering from terminal prostrate cancer and has supposedly got only three months to live.


Why three supposedlys?  Well because the three medical consultants who testified that he had just three months to live were paid to do so ... by the Libyan government.  This made release on compassionate grounds legally possible which an expectation of, say, four months would not have. 


He was said to be released under a prisoner swap agreement such that he would complete his sentence n a Libyan jail, which of course nobody expected would be honoured. 


Mr al Megrahi's release was part of a deal stitched up in 2007, the quid-pro-quo for which was a juicy £54 billion contract for BP to explore for and develop massive Libyan acreage with great potential for oil and gas. 



BP were the biggest player in Libya in the 1960s before Col Gadaffi nationalised the industry after his coup, so the Corporation  knows the geology well from its tremendous archives. 


The sweet deal between BP and the British government was negotiated -


on behalf of BP by Sir Mark Allen, a former MI6 spy and counter-terrorism chief with close links to Gadaffi's son Seif, who had joined BP as a senior executive (a Special Adviser), and


on behalf of the British government long-time Labour loyalist Nick Butler, for many years a senior strategist with BP, who had joined Gordon Brown's office in Downing Street as Economic Adviser. 


As Guido Fawkes pithily puts it - two men; one ex-BP now at the heart of government, the other ex-MI6 and now at the heart of BP.  They oiled the wheels to release a convicted mass murderer – and now BP will make billions.  And no doubt contribute some of this gratefully to Labour Party coffers. 


You couldn't make it up. 



But that's not all.  The latest news is that Britain's famed and feared SAS has been sent to Tripoli not to capture or kill one of the world's most wicked dictators. But to teach his special forces the tricks of the trade for which Britain's own armed forces have become renowned.  Who can forget the SAS's courageous and dramatic assault on the besieged Iranian Embassy in central London in 1980? 


This is the organization which has now been ordered to instruct the Libyans in their dark arts, apparently as a further piece of the terrorist-for-oil jigsaw puzzle.  You can imagine how delighted these wonderful soldiers must be, to be forced to train the very country which made such a substantial contribution to the deaths of so many of their never-forgotten comrades in Northern Ireland. 


What positive outcome can anyone expect by improving Col Gadaffi's ability to defend himself?  (Because no-one's waging war against Libya.)  Nevertheless, helping to preserve his evil regime has evidently become a priority for the British government under Gordon Brown. 


Moreover, who can doubt that whatever military skills his special forces learn from the SAS will immediately be passed on to shady Islamic groups?  Hezbollah and Hamas must surely be licking their lips: not only at the thought of applying these skills, but also in being better able to defend against them. 


And insofar as the Western alliances trust each other and share a lot of their military technology and ideas, it will not be just British troops who are compromised but those of America, Israel and others.  Surely that trust has been shattered. 


The number of combat deaths of British forces and of its Allies will not be reduced by this SAS training. 

That's why I ask the question: is Gordon Brown backing Britain?  Rumours used to circulate Harold Wilson, Labour prime minister in the 1970s when the party was much more wedded to the virus of socialism, was in reality a Communist spy in the pay of the Soviet Empire.  So the concept, however misplaced,  of a non-patriotic chief executive is not a new one. 

Or is Mr Brown so enraged at his own incompetence and unpopularity that his idea of revenge against his fellow-countrymen is to wage war against them?  Or, more likely, have the pills simply taken over his capacity for rational thought and behaviour?

Whatever the cause, he has become a menace to the security of Britain and therefore the free world. 

The sooner the British people eject Prime Minister Brown the better for everyone. 

Back to List of Contents

Lisbon Slogans and Platitudes

At the beginning of this month, the campaigning over Ireland's referendum on the Lisbon Treaty finally began in earnest, with countless pious statements on TV and radio, and lampposts festooned with posters and slogans. 

I have made no secret of my stance, as a Lisbon Naysayer.  In addition to what I wrote at the time of Ireland's first referendum last year, my most recent blog expounded at some length on several of the reasons. 

We Naysayers have a built-in advantage in the argument in that we can easily find bits and pieces to specifically object to, whereas the Yessirs are in greater difficulty because due to the very nature of the treaty their arguments must necessarily be much more amorphous while skirting round the anomalies. 

Consequently the Yessirs spent most of their energy last time in refuting the arguments - false or otherwise - put forward by the Naysayers, and neglected to propound positive reasons for voting Yes.  Moreover, if you spend all your energy trying to shoot down your opponents arguments, all you do is embed those arguments in the public's mind. 

They have perhaps learnt something from this in the current campaign, but not very much.  For the Yessirs' slogans are pathetic and meaningless.  Worse than that, they are so lacking in logic that they could be used equally by the Naysayers.  This is because the Yessirs have again fallen into the trap of thinking that a No vote means a vote to quit the EU, whereas it means nothing of the sort.  It merely means that Naysayers would rather retain the EU as it is than move to a different EU bound by Lisbon rules. 

Naysayers still believe the propaganda that got the Nice Treaty through an Irish referendum on the second attempt: that Nice was needed to streamline the workings of the EU in preparation for the imminent access of many new members (ten joined in 2004 plus two more in 2007). 

Here are the pro-Lisbon slogans I spotted around Dublin.  Not one of them leads naturally to a Yes vote. 


We need Europe


I want a stronger voice in Europe


The choice is yours


Ireland needs Europe


We're stronger with Europe


I'm safer in Europe


Work with Europe


We belong - you decide


Yes to recovery


We belong to Europe, vote Yes


Vote Yes to keep Ireland in the heart of Europe

As for the canard that a No vote will somehow lead to Ireland's demotion within or  exit from the EU, there are no provisions in any EU treaty (including Lisbon) for the expulsion of a member-state, or for the imposition of sanctions on any member state as a consequence of a democratic decision made by the citizens of that state, nor are there any existing legal provisions for the establishment of a second-tier status for some states within the EU.

The Yes side is coming up with stories such as these to frighten people into voting Yes, because it can find very little in the way of coherent, non-generalised arguments that advocate a Yes vote on its own merits.  So instead, it is reduced to


platitudes (such as those poster slogans) or


scaremongering or


trying to shoot down the arguments of the Naysayers. 

I predict a victory for the No side, but not as comprehensively as the last time and with a smaller turnout because so many voters in the current financial climate have their minds too full of their economic woes. 

Back to List of Contents

Irish Senior Citizens Parliament and Lisbon

Last week, in a moment of foolishness, I accepted an invitation to speak to a meeting of older people under the auspices of the Irish Senior Citizens Parliament, an organization comprising over 120,000 members.  The purpose of the debate, called Communicating Europe, which took place on the auspicious ninth of the ninth of the ninth, was to explain the innards of the Lisbon Treaty and to present arguments for and against it, in the context of Ireland's (second) referendum which will be held on 2nd October, in view of the wrong answer given in June 2009.   

I, of course, spoke for the No side, representing myself, a lonesome engineer with aspirations to be a blogger and occasional columnist.  I was somewhat taken aback to discover that my opponents on the Yes side were to be a Cabinet Minister, Mary Hanafin from the ruling Fianna Fail party and a long-serving MEP, Proinsias de Rossa (Irish for Francis Rose) of Labour.  They were later joined by a TD (member of the Irish parliament), Sean Barrett, from the main opposition party Fine Gael.  With me as a Naysayer was Eoin Ó Broin from Sinn Féin, a connection which makes me feel distinctly uncomfortable. 

Speakers for and against the Lisbon Treaty

Left-to-Right, and advocacy (Yes or No): Matt Coleman (ISCP), myself (No), Máiréad Hayes(CEO of the Irish Senior Citizens Parliament), Eoin O’Broin (No, Sinn Féin), Mary Hanafin (Yes, Minister), Proinsias de Rossa (Yes, MEP), Frank Farrelly (ISCP chair of the meeting), Seán Barrett (Yes, TD)

The meeting opened with a talk about the facts” of Lisbon by Andrea Pappin, Executive Director of the European Movement Ireland, supposedly a non-partisan organization; her talk nevertheless conveyed a pro-Lisbon message. 

Minister Hanafin, Mr Ó Broin and Mr deRossa then made their presentations.  They should be commended for the respectful, open and calm manner in which they spoke, even if I supported neither the pro-Lisbon conclusions of the first and third, nor much of the anti-capitalist pro-neutrality arguments of the second. 

Then it was my turn.  With this provocative little chart as a backdrop, I launched into my ten-minute spiel, with a passionate rendition of more or less what I wrote in my previous blogVoting NO to Lisbon - Again”.  If you are really bored, you can listen to my recording of it here

It was my first-ever political speech.  I could see the polite irritation of the professional politicians, which by the way also included in the audience two more Fianna Fail ministers, Conor Lenihan and Barry Andrews. Mr Barrett, a last-minute inclusion, then explained why his opposition party was supporting the Government over Lisbon. 

(After the meeting, the organisers apologised to me that the Naysaying speakers were outnumbered four-to-two). 

Questions then followed from the audience, which the panel were invited to respond to.  The questions were beyond my competence so my contribution was pretty thin. 

However Mr DeRossa used the opportunity to attack some figures that I had quoted.  I had said that

in recent times, new EU laws have been churned out at almost two thousand per year, now standing at over 30,000.” 

Speaking as an MEP, he said the annual figure of two thousand was ridiculous; his own experience was nearer to twelve.  I responded that my figures were carefully researched but I didn't have the details with me. 

Later I looked into the matter and the next day was able to write to him along the following lines. 

The figures I had used originate in the EurLex register of EU rules.  I was alerted to them by this statement on Libertas' website:

"A count of the official EurLex register of EU rules shows that a total of 9863 new laws have been introduced since Barroso’s term started in 2004. The total number of EU laws has increased by close to 50% to 30675 in those four years alone." 

I confess that I did not go to EurLex to confirm the figures, but a quick look subsequently shows that there are at least 17,417 acts of legislation currently in force, with another 1330 "in preparation"

A search of legislative acts which came into force between 1st Jan 2004 and 31 August 2009 results in 10,761 acts (1077 pages, each with about ten acts per page).

Thus, the two thousand per year figure I used in my speech appears to be accurate, however the 30,000 figure may be somewhat overstated though it is in the right ballpark. 

I feel my use of those statistics was justifiable and not misleading, and that Mr deRossa's suggestion that the EU puts out only a dozen laws per year is clearly wrong.  Unless there is a definitional problem as to what a law or a legislative act is. 

He did not write back to me. 

Back to List of Contents

Clean Water Instantly

This video clip is a great example of human ingenuity, and also of how to give a compelling presentation. 

The LifeSaver bottle which it describes can put clean pure water in the hands of disaster victims as fast as a cargo-plane can fly to the disaster zone.  It is nothing but a hand-operated filter system with pores so fine (15 microns) that it sieves out  bacteria, viruses, cysts, parasites, fungi and all other microbiological waterborne pathogens. It does all this without the aid of any chemicals such as iodine or chlorine.  A 4,000 litre costs £115. 

Watch and enjoy, and maybe even buy one.  (No commission for me, worst luck)

Hat-tip: Guido Fawkes

Incidentally, six long years ago I reported on an alternative instant water-purification device with no moving parts at all, then called the Hydropack, for use in similarly fraught areas. 

Back to List of Contents

Issue 196’s Comment to Cyberspace

Only one submissions in the past few weeks, which led to a minor altercation with the object of my derision, but it was amicably settled.   


Time for Tesco to change its tune on Unicef
Comment to the Irish Times
I agree that Tesco, having been alerted that their slogan is already in long-term use by UNICEF, should simply withdraw it, which would be an elegant solution to the dispute. They have no excuse.  However the rest of Mr Gibbons polemic is undergraduate drivel ...  

Back to List of Contents

Quotes for Issue 196

- - - - - S O M A L I A - - - - -

Quote: Three of my friends died but who killed them is the question. We were expecting a ransom this morning.”

A member of al-Shabaab,
which is al-Qaeda’s proxy in the Horn of Africa,
confirms the extraordinary case in Somalia
of a kidnapped French security adviser Marc Aubriere
who killed his three captors and escaped. 

Now that's what I call a security adviser.

- - - - - U S - - - - -

Quote: You lie!

Joe Wilson, in full throatCongressman Joe Wilson (a Republican)
breaches protocol by
shouting at President Obama
during a nationally televised address
to both chambers of Congress. 

Mr Obama had just said
The [health care] reforms I'm proposing
would not apply to those who are here illegally

Mr Wilson later apologised for his lack of civility,
saying his emotions got the better of him,
but insisted that his accusation was correct.

Quote: Let us pray, for the next thirty years we will learn that if a candidate


has no executive experience,


had a history of eliminating his senatorial rivals through leaked divorce records,


was the most partisan of some 100 Senators in his brief two-year tenure,


had a disturbing affinity for radical anti-Americans like Rev. Wright and Bill Ayers,

then he really [is] ruthless, largely inexperienced, and not at all convinced that American has ever been an exceptional nation.

Prof Victor Davis Henson, on his president, Barack Obama

Quote: Who knows — maybe she'd feel it was worth it.

Mellisa Lafsky speculates that Mary Jo Kopechne
might have thought her death in Chappaquiddick in 1969
at the hands of Ted Kennedy was a noble sacrifice
worth Kennedy's subsequent 47 year career in the US Senate.

Quote: You are really going to be surprised what happened was a powerful, heart-warming story.  You are going to be absolutely impressed with this disgusting thing that took place with me in the beginning. I turned my life completely around.

Phillip Garrido, boasting on the phone to a radio station
from his detention cell in San Francisco. 

He is accused of, inter alia, kidnapping
Jaycee Dugard when she was just eleven,
raping her and holding her hostage for 18 years,
during which period she bore him two children. 

He is clearly enjoying his notoriety. 
But thankfully he will never walk free alive.

- - - - - C L I M A T E   C H A N G E O L O G Y   C U L T - - - - -

Quote: Tim Nicholson, 41, [has] views amounting to a philosophical belief in climate change, allowing him the same legal protection against discrimination as religious beliefs.”  

An employment tribunal in England under Judge David Sneath
equates environmentalism with religion,
and so upholds a complaint that
Mr Nicholson was unfairly dismissed from his job
as a result of
religious” discrimination.

In my view, the environmentalism of
typical global warm-mongers
is less a religion than a cult, the Climate Changeology Cult.

- - - - - B R I T A I N - - - - -

Quote: For many, Britain fights, Germany pays, France calculates, Italy avoids.”

Eric Joyce MP, in a letter to Gordon Brown
resigning as Principal Private Secretary
to four successive Secretaries of of Defence. 

He is summing up how Americans in particular
view their Nato
allies in Afghanistan.

But, hey, is nobody left to man the photocopier? 

- - - - - I R E L A N D - - - - -

Quote: You have to make a choice.


Did you not know what was going on?


If you didn’t, you must ask yourself, are you a competent director? And if you did know, you were complicit in recklessness and fraud.

So which is it? Because there isn’t anything in between.”

Irishman Niall Fitzgerald,
a former chief executive of Unilever and
non-executive director of the Bank of Ireland in the 1990s.

He was lecturing students about the need to accept accountability
for corporate behaviours leading to the financial crash.

Quote: All of [the EU's political leaders] know quite well that if the similar question [on approving the Lisbon Treaty] was put to their electorate by a referendum the answer in 95% of the countries would probably have been No.”

Charlie McCreevy, Ireland's EU Commissioner,
points out that the leaders of the EU member states
(other than the Irish) are relieved
not to have to put the Lisbon Treaty to a vote,
because they know most of them would lose.

- - - - - J A P A N - - - - -

Quote: “I eat the sun.  Like this: yum, yum, yum. It gives me enormous energy ... My husband has recently started doing that too ... While my body was asleep, I think my soul rode on a triangular-shaped UFO and went to Venus.  It was a very beautiful place and it was really green ... [Tom Cruise] was Japanese in a previous life.

Miyuki Hatoyama, wife of Japan's new prime minister, Yukio Hatoyama,
in a book she published last year 
(“Very Strange Things I’ve Encountered”). 

She seems to have joined the nutty First Lady's Club,
along with Cherie Blair (weird goings on with Carole Caplin),
Nancy Reagan (astrologers) and no doubt others. 

Back to List of Contents

See the Archive and Blogroll at top left and right, for your convenience

Back to Top of Page



Now, for a little [Light Relief]

Hit Counter

2013 RWC7s Logo

Gift Idea
Cuddly Teddy Bears
looking for a home

Click for details  “”

Neda Agha Soltan, 1982-2009
Neda Agha Soltan;
shot dead in Teheran
by Basij militia

Good to report that as at
14th September 2009
he is at least alive.

ON 18th OCTOBER 2011,

Support Denmark and its caroonists!

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11



Adam Smith  

Alt Tag  

Andrew Sullivan

Atlantic Blog (defunct)

Back Seat Drivers

Belfast Gonzo

Black Line  

Blog-Irish (defunct)

Broom of Anger 

Charles Krauthammer

Cox and Forkum

Defiant  Irishwoman  

Disillusioned Lefty

Douglas Murray

Freedom Institute  

Gavin's Blog 

Guido Fawkes


Internet Commentator

Irish Blogs

Irish Eagle

Irish Elk

Jawa Report

Kevin Myers

Mark Humphrys 

Mark Steyn

Melanie Phillips

Not a Fish

Parnell's Ireland

Rolfe's Random Review


Sarah Carey / GUBU

Sicilian Notes  

Slugger O'Toole

Thinking Man's Guide

Turbulence Ahead

Victor Davis Hanson

Watching Israel

Wulfbeorn, Watching



Awareness Project



Iona Institute
Skeptical Bible  

Skeptical Quran  



Razzamatazz Blog  

Sawyer the Lawyer

Tales from Warri

Twenty Major

Graham's  Sporting Wk


Blog Directory


Discover the World


My Columns in the


Irish Times


Sunday Times


 What I've recently
been reading

The Lemon Tree, by Sandy Tol, 2006
“The Lemon Tree”, by Sandy Tol (2006),
is a delightful novel-style history of modern Israel and Palestine told through the eyes of a thoughtful protagonist from either side, with a household lemon tree as their unifying theme.

But it's not entirely honest in its subtle pro-Palestinian bias, and therefore needs to be read in conjunction with an antidote, such as
The Case for Israel, Alan Dershowitz, 2004

See detailed review


Drowning in Oil - Macondo Blowout
examines events which led to BP's 2010 Macondo blowout in the Gulf of Mexico. 

BP's ambitious CEO John Browne expanded it through adventurous acquisitions, aggressive offshore exploration, and relentless cost-reduction that trumped everything else, even safety and long-term technical sustainability.  

Thus mistakes accumulated, leading to terrifying and deadly accidents in refineries, pipelines and offshore operations, and business disaster in Russia.  

The Macondo blowout was but an inevitable outcome of a BP culture that had become poisonous and incompetent. 

However the book is gravely compromised by a litany of over 40 technical and stupid errors that display the author's ignorance and carelessness. 

It would be better to wait for the second (properly edited) edition before buying. 

As for BP, only a wholesale rebuilding of a new, professional, ethical culture will prevent further such tragedies and the eventual destruction of a once mighty corporation with a long and generally honourable history.

Note: I wrote my own reports on Macondo
May, June, and July 2010


Published in April 2010; banned in Singapore

A horrific account of:


how the death penalty is administered and, er, executed in Singapore,


the corruption of Singapore's legal system, and


Singapore's enthusiastic embrace of Burma's drug-fuelled military dictatorship

More details on my blog here.


Product Details
This is nonagenarian Alistair Urquhart’s incredible story of survival in the Far East during World War II.

After recounting a childhood of convention and simple pleasures in working-class Aberdeen, Mr Urquhart is conscripted within days of Chamberlain declaring war on Germany in 1939.

From then until the Japanese are deservedly nuked into surrendering six years later, Mr Urquhart’s tale is one of first discomfort but then following the fall of Singapore of ever-increasing, unmitigated horror. 

After a wretched journey Eastward, he finds himself part of Singapore’s big but useless garrison.

Taken prisoner when Singapore falls in 1941, he is, successively,


part of a death march to Thailand,


a slave labourer on the Siam/Burma railway (one man died for every sleeper laid),


regularly beaten and tortured,


racked by starvation, gaping ulcers and disease including cholera,


a slave labourer stevedoring at Singapore’s docks,


shipped to Japan in a stinking, closed, airless hold with 900 other sick and dying men,


torpedoed by the Americans and left drifting alone for five days before being picked up,


a slave-labourer in Nagasaki until blessed liberation thanks to the Americans’ “Fat Boy” atomic bomb.

Chronically ill, distraught and traumatised on return to Aberdeen yet disdained by the British Army, he slowly reconstructs a life.  Only in his late 80s is he able finally to recount his dreadful experiences in this unputdownable book.

There are very few first-person eye-witness accounts of the the horrors of Japanese brutality during WW2. As such this book is an invaluable historical document.


Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks, and Cronies
Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks, and Cronies

This is a rattling good tale of the web of corruption within which the American president and his cronies operate. It's written by blogger Michele Malkin who, because she's both a woman and half-Asian, is curiously immune to the charges of racism and sexism this book would provoke if written by a typical Republican WASP.

With 75 page of notes to back up - in best blogger tradition - every shocking and in most cases money-grubbing allegation, she excoriates one Obama crony after another, starting with the incumbent himself and his equally tricky wife. 

Joe Biden, Rahm Emmanuel, Valerie Jarett, Tim Geithner, Lawrence Summers, Steven Rattner, both Clintons, Chris Dodd: they all star as crooks in this venomous but credible book. 

ACORN, Mr Obama's favourite community organising outfit, is also exposed for the crooked vote-rigging machine it is.


This much trumpeted sequel to Freakonomics is a bit of disappointment. 

It is really just a collation of amusing little tales about surprising human (and occasionally animal) behaviour and situations.  For example:


Drunk walking kills more people per kilometer than drunk driving.


People aren't really altruistic - they always expect a return of some sort for good deeds.


Child seats are a waste of money as they are no safer for children than adult seatbelts.


Though doctors have known for centuries they must wash their hands to avoid spreading infection, they still often fail to do so. 


Monkeys can be taught to use washers as cash to buy tit-bits - and even sex.

The book has no real message other than don't be surprised how humans sometimes behave and try to look for simple rather than complex solutions.

And with a final anecdote (monkeys, cash and sex), the book suddenly just stops dead in its tracks.  Weird.


False Economy: A Surprising Economic History of the World
A remarkable, coherent attempt by Financial Times economist Alan Beattie to understand and explain world history through the prism of economics. 

It's chapters are organised around provocative questions such as


Why does asparagus come from Peru?


Why are pandas so useless?


Why are oil and diamonds more trouble than they are worth?


Why doesn't Africa grow cocaine?

It's central thesis is that economic development continues to be impeded in different countries for different historical reasons, even when the original rationale for those impediments no longer obtains.  For instance:


Argentina protects its now largely foreign landowners (eg George Soros)


Russia its military-owned businesses, such as counterfeit DVDs


The US its cotton industry comprising only 1% of GDP and 2% of its workforce

The author writes in a very chatty, light-hearted matter which makes the book easy to digest. 

However it would benefit from a few charts to illustrate some of the many quantitative points put forward, as well as sub-chaptering every few pages to provide natural break-points for the reader. 


Burmese Outpost, by Anthony Irwin
This is a thrilling book of derring-do behind enemy lines in the jungles of north-east Burma in 1942-44 during the Japanese occupation.

The author was a member of Britain's V Force, a forerunner of the SAS. Its remit was to harass Japanese lines of command, patrol their occupied territory, carryout sabotage and provide intelligence, with the overall objective of keeping the enemy out of India.   

Irwin is admirably yet brutally frank, in his descriptions of deathly battles with the Japs, his execution of a prisoner, dodging falling bags of rice dropped by the RAF, or collapsing in floods of tears through accumulated stress, fear and loneliness. 

He also provides some fascinating insights into the mentality of Japanese soldiery and why it failed against the flexibility and devolved authority of the British. 

The book amounts to a  very human and exhilarating tale.

Oh, and Irwin describes the death in 1943 of his colleague my uncle, Major PF Brennan.


Other books here

Rugby World Cup 7s, Dubai 2009
Click for an account of this momentous, high-speed event
of March 2009

 Rugby World Cup 2007
Click on the logo
to get a table with
the Rugby World Cup
scores, points and rankings.


After 48 crackling, compelling, captivating games, the new World Champions are, deservedly,

England get the Silver,
Argentina the Bronze.  Fourth is host nation France.

No-one can argue with
the justice of the outcomes

Over the competition,
the average
points per game =
tries per game =
minutes per try = 13

Click here to see all the latest scores, points and rankings  
Click on the logo
to get a table with
the final World Cup
scores, points, rankings and goal-statistics

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by