|
| |
TALLRITE BLOG
ARCHIVE
This archive contains all issues prior to the current week and the three
preceding weeks, which are published in
the main Tallrite Blog (www.tallrite.com/blog.htm).
The first issue appeared on Sunday 14th July
2002
You can write to blog@tallrite.com |
| July
2003 |
|
|
ISSUE
#48 - 27th July 2003 [
226]
|
|
Liberia -
How Did It Get Where It Is ?
Ryszard
Kapuscinski tells us that in 1821, Robert Stockton, an agent
of the American Colonization Society, arrived in what is now Monrovia and
forced the local tribal chief, King Peter, to sell - for six muskets and a
trunk of beads - what is now Liberia. This
was to settle slaves freed from the cotton plantations of the southern
USA, as a charitable reparation for the crime of slavery.
From
then on, liberated slaves were shipped in until by 1847, when the Republic
of Liberia was proclaimed with a US-style constitution, there were 6,000
of them, though they amounted
to just 1% of the countrys population.
The fate and behaviour of these settlers, who called
themselves Americo-Liberians, is fascinating.
They did not know how to read or write, had no trade
or professional skills and had never had any legal rights.
Post-publication
Note (28th July)
Reader Donnah takes issue with
some of the above and provides this academic
link. I
cant agree with your history of Liberian settlement,
she says. They
werent all from the South, and at least half were literate. Almost half
were freeborn. Four different societies had settlements. Its just not
so simple as you have it.
But this does not materially affect the remainder of this brief history
of Liberia.
Nevertheless, suddenly
they found themselves, bewildered and left to their own fate, in an Africa
they didnt know among indigenous blacks
they had nothing in common with but their colour.
The only non-family relationship they knew was
master-to-slave. Their first
move upon arrival, therefore, was to re-create precisely that social
structure, only now they, the slaves of yesterday, became the masters, and
they set out to enslave the locals. They
did not wish to abolish an unjust order, but wanted to preserve it and
exploit it for their own benefit. They simply could not
imagine a world in which all would be free.
A large portion of Liberia was covered in thick,
tropical, humid, malarial jungle, inhabited by small, impoverished and
weakly organized tribes. Relations
with the newcomers from across the ocean were hostile from the start. The Americo-Liberians quickly proclaimed that only they could
be citizens, not the other 99% whom they categorised as uncultured tribesmen,
savage, heathen.
The two groups lived far apart, for the new masters
stuck to coastal settlements, of which Monrovia was the largest.
It was over 100 years before the first president, William Tubman,
in 1947, ventured into the interior.
Since everyone looked ethnically similar, the
newcomers would underline their difference and superiority by promenading
in morning coats and white gloves, the ladies in heavy wigs and grand hats. They built Gone-With-the-Wind style southern mansions
to live in, worshiped in churches closed to the natives, attended
exclusive private clubs. Close
contact with the locals, particularly inter-marriage, was forbidden.
Locals were confined to tribal homelands. Dissidence was used as an excuse to punish and execute
troublemakers, destroy their villages and crops and above all capture
slaves. The slaves were put
to work on the Americo-Liberians farms and businesses and exported to
Fernando Po and Guinea. Only
in 1920 was slavery officially abolished but it nevertheless continued
with stealth, barely unabated.
The Americo-Liberians established a Leninist-style
one-party state under the True
Whig Party
that maintained dictatorial monopoly power for 111 years until 1980.
You could achieve something only if you were a member of the party;
opponents ended up in prison, dead or abroad.
From 1944 to 1971, William Tubman was the boss of the
True Whig Party, and thus automatically Liberias president. He
ruled the
country like a manor squire, hearing petitions from his countrymen,
dispatching his secret police, knowing and deciding everything.
People believed he possessed magical powers :
 |
If someone handed him a poisoned drink, the glass
would shatter; |
 |
an assassins bullet would melt in mid-air; |
 |
special herbs allowed him to win every election;
and |
 |
he could see everything that was happening,
anywhere - so there was no sense in conspiracy, since it would always
be found out.
|
When he died, his vice-president William Tolbert took
over. Whereas Tubman loved power, for Tolbert is was money from any source
- gold, cars, passports, rackets. The entire élite, those descendants of
black American slaves, followed his example. People who begged in the
street for bread or water were shot on Tolberts orders. His police killed
hundreds.
Then early on 12th April 1980, seventeen lowly soldiers barged
into the presidents villa to demand unpaid wages, found Tolbert in bed
and on an impulse hacked him to pieces. They disemboweled him and threw his internal
organs out into the courtyard for the dogs and vultures.
Their leader was a 28 year-old sergeant, Samuel Doe. He was barely
literate, from the small tribe of Krahn, which lived deep in the jungle.
He was just one of thousands of people who for years had been trekking
from the interior into Monrovia, in search of work and money, though there
was very little of either. They were ready fodder for any local chieftain
or gangster or indeed the army, looking for low-cost muscle.
Doe immediately declared himself president, the first
non-Americo-Liberian, and in one sense represented a liberation of the
locals from those hated rulers descended from American slaves.
He quickly staged a public execution of thirteen
Tolbert ministers. This set
the scene for a decade of despotic rule dominated by his need to amass
money and eliminate opponents. For
both these ends, he surrounded himself with primitive fellow-Krahn
tribesmen suddenly summoned in large numbers from the jungle. They
in turn quickly learnt the art of accumulating money and consolidating
their position by killing non-Krahn. Most of the former élite, the Americo-Liberians, used their
wealth to flee the country.
But under Doe, the country progressed not an iota.
 |
He was lazy, |
 |
spent long hours playing chequers with his
subordinates, |
 |
knew and cared nothing of economics and
politics. |
Then along came the present-day president, Charles
Taylor, who after a period in and out of jail in the USA, launched a war
in 1989 against the by-now hugely unpopular Doe, who was once his friend.
Doe sent out an army of his Krahn, but instead of fighting Taylor,
they went on a spree of indiscriminate plunder.
This caused the terrified populace to flee to the cause of Taylor
who with a much enlarged army quickly arrived at the outskirts of
Monrovia.
At this point, Taylors chief of staff, Prince
Johnson, another of Does ex-friends, broke away and formed his own army
so that there was now a three-way civil war going on.
In 1990, Johnson managed to ambush and capture Doe,
whom he interrogated and tortured to death, including cutting off his
ears, while filming the proceedings in loving detail. The inquisition had only one purpose : to find out the number
of his private bank account where the booty from his ten years of misrule
was stashed. Indeed such booty has long been the reward of Liberias
presidents and thus the attraction of supplanting them.
The civil war progressed, with an African, mainly
Nigerian, interventionist force, ECOMOG, becoming a fourth and dominant combatant (and
one with its own special interest in plunder, earning it the nickname Every
Car Or Moveable Object Gone).
Eventually ECOMOG seized Monrovia but the rest of the
country descended into the chaotic grip of Taylor and like-minded warlords who
carved out their own fiefs and whose principal objective was to garner
money - from natural resources, from tolls, from businesses, from state
institutions, from international aid and from the poor wretches unlucky
enough to be living within their respective purviews.
But as the pillage ran dry, a peace treaty was signed
in 1995, resulting in the election of Taylor as president, the withdrawal
of ECOMOG and a fresh influx of international aid money available for
looting.
Fighting
within the country did not stop, however, but spread to international
meddling, as Taylor supported, and traded arms for diamonds with, rebels
fighting in Sierra Leone, Guinea and Côte dIvoire, earning him a UN
indictment for war crimes. At
the same time, rebels within Liberia, many aided by brutal Sierra Leone
and Guinea government troops, began to make territorial gains, killing and
displacing thousands of Liberians. They called
themselves Liberians United for Reconciliation and
Democracy
(LURD), a typical soubriquet for an unruly bunch interested in neither
reconciliation nor democracy.
The current LURD civil war - insofar as this term implies that one Liberian
civil war has been different from another - is about nothing.
 | No rebel is saying the current government is corrupt or incompetent
(though it is both). |
 | This is no conflict been leftist Marxists/Maoists and right-wing
capitalists. |
 | The only ideological struggle Liberia has known has been between the
original impoverished natives and the élite Americo-Liberians but the latter have long
since decamped. |
So the only issue at stake is who operates the levers of power and
therefore has access to the pitiful bit of wealth that still remains in Liberia.
The LURD renegades reckon Charles Taylor has had long enough at the trough and now
it is someone elses turn.
And
right now they are encroaching on Monrovia itself, creating the current
panic, city-centre shell-fire, street-killings
and calls for intervention by ECOMOG and the US.
With
Americas unpopularity, struggles and daily losses in Iraq and the
confidence-sapping history of Liberian corruption and civil war, it is
little wonder that President Bush is hesitating before sending in his army
and is at least insisting that ECOMOG does so first.
Charles
Taylor has said he will step down; Nigerias president has offered
him asylum.
But
there is little doubt he will hang on as doggedly as Saddam Hussein did,
and will leave only when someone forces him to. America understands
all about regime-change and nation-rebuilding, but whether Bush has the stomach for
a third such foray is
a different matter. Especially when the prognosis for long-term
improvement is so bleak.
So
the agony of ordinary Liberians continues.
Read
this alternative
brief history of Liberia to get a few additional details from
war-correspondent Richard Krantz.

Back
to Index
Photographing Uday and Qusay
An awful lot of western liberal bluster followed the
publication of those rather gruesome post-mortem photos of Saddams odious
sons Uday and Qusay. Disgusting, unnecessary, pandering to
perversion, against the Geneva Convention etc.
I was reminded of what happened at the end of World
War 2. As the Soviets invaded Berlin, Adolf Hitler (and his new wife
Eva Braun) blew their brains out. Or so it was said, since Hitlers
corpse was apparently never found. As a result, the Nazi underground
- and not only in Germany - continued resisting for a lot longer than it
might have done, because those closet Nazis lived in hopes that the Fuhrer
would reappear and lead them back to greatness. There were many sightings
of Hitler in South America and elsewhere, almost as many as Elvis
sightings.
Had photos of Hitlers corpse been distributed across
the country, or his corpse been displayed as Mussolinis
upturned body was, it would have been very different. Just as Italys fascists disappeared overnight with the indisputable elimination
of their Duce, hopelessness would have also overtaken those Nazi
dissidents, and Germanys de-Nazification process would have been faster
and smoother.
Ironically, it emerged after the fall of the Soviet
Union, that the Russians had in fact found Hitlers body, cut off the head
and brought it back to Moscow. But this was all kept
secret.
Learning therefore from Germany and Italy, it is
important to convince everyone in Iraq that the sons are gone, in order
both to
 |
bring despair to remaining Baathists and bring
home to them the hopelessness of continuing any rear-guard action,
and |
 |
remove or reduce fear of Saddams return for the
vast majority of Iraqis who are of good will. |
The more photos and video clips of the bodies the
better. And it was right to shave them and clean them up so as to
look as much as possible like they did in
life.
Tasteful ? No. Necessary ?
Yes.
A niggling question however troubles me.
Instead of winning their victory with 200 men in a six-hour gunbattle, why
did the Americans not simply lay siege to that villa in Mosul ?
There were only four, lightly armed people in the house. With
patience, in maybe a week, maybe a month, surely they could have been
taken alive.
 |
This would have allowed much valuable
intelligence to be gleaned, not least about Saddam himself and the WMD
programme. |
 |
Equally, the brothers could have been put on
trial for their war crimes in a public display of justice akin to the
Nuremburg trials. |
Remember Waco
and the siege of the Branch Davidian compound in 1993 ? How in a fit
of impatience the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms went in shooting
and precipitated the deaths of 56 cult members plus 20 children ?
The Americans do not seem very good in the patience department, mores the
pity.

Back
to Index
Down
With Tanya Streeter
Last October, I reported
on the tragic death of Audrey Mestre while attempting to break the the No
Limits world record for so-called free diving, that is, diving
without breathing apparatus. There are now five categories where
records are awarded, by either or both of two free-dive organizations, the IAFD
and the AIDA (who dont always recognize each others
records).
- Constant Ballast or Constant Weight : Diving without
any external aids other than flippers and mask. The world record
for this is 87 metres, set in April 2002.
- Variable Weight : Dragging yourself down a rope
anchored to the bottom. Record 131 meters, November
2001.
- No Limits : Allowing yourself to be pulled down
the rope by a 200 lb weight and brought back to the surface with the
help of an inflatable balloon. The record for this is 162
metres, or 170 metres if Audreys fatal attempt is counted.
- Variable Ballast : Allowing yourself to be pulled down
the rope by a 200 lb weight but swimming back to the surface with no
external aid other than flippers. Record 95 metres (women) and
120 metres (men).
- Constant Weight / No Fins, where you dive with no
swimming aids at all - no weights, fins or mask. This strenuous
category was established only in January 2003.
Last week, in a fanfare of ballyhoo, Tanya Streeter,
in waters off the Turks and Caicos Islands, a tiny British colony in
the Caribbean -
 |
broke the all-comers world
record
for category 4 with an astonishing dive to 122 metres, lasting over
3½ minutes. |
 |
And just the following day, set another
world record, in category 5, reaching 35 metres in a dive of 1¾
minutes. It was her ninth world record. |
Commenting on her dives compared to
Audreys, she points
out that she did 17 training dives and had 14 safety divers. By
contrast Audrey had only three of either. She reckons that had
Audreys fatal plunge taken place in the US or UK, criminal negligence
charges would have followed. In other words, the death was
avoidable.
Meanwhile, the Turks & Caicos government are so
thrilled with the publicity caused by her dives, they are going to feature
her on a set of five stamps,
the first living person other than royalty to be accorded such an
honour.

Back
to Index
Bombe Surprise
at Toulouse Airport
We have to be more careful than we might think when
packing to fly off for our foreign vacations these days. We all
know were no longer supposed to pack camping gaz or barbecue lighter
fluid or chain-saws or firecrackers or countless other frivolous things
needed to lighten up our holidays.
And when our hand baggage is searched, deadly items
such as nail scissors or corkscrews will be confiscated so that all were
left with to stage our hijacking is breakable glass bottles of inflammable
vodka from the duty free shop.
But Gail Brooker, 53, who owns a guest house in
England discovered another no-no. Last week, she accidentally left
her blue rucksack at Toulouse airport but when she tried to phone the
airport she found it was closed. So her boyfriend drove back to the
airport next day to look for it, only to be told it had ... exploded.
Thats why the airport had been closed. No-one was
laughing.
It seems the abandoned bag was put through an X-Ray
machine which revealed that as well as ordinary things like socks, underwear
and
a camera, it contained a quantity of Semtex,
the terrorists favourite plastic explosive. So the authorities
quite properly took the bag to a safe place and blew it up.
Only the Semtex wasnt Semtex. It was puff
pastry. They look exactly the same. Gail had packed some
in her bag because she could never find decent pastry in French
supermarkets. There were four people in her group and she wanted to
cook them her speciality - chicken
pie.
Some time ago, I described
some of the latest developments in airport scanning technology - the mind-reader,
the blush-detector and the
naked
body revealer. But Gail has shown the need for someone to invent
a puff-pastry-sniffer.
So until then be warned. No nail clippers, no
corkscrews, and definitely no puff pastry.

Back
to Index
Winning
Streak Causes Royal Flush
Britains royal occasions have a well deserved reputation for
being turgid affairs; it is rare that anything happens that might redden
royal cheeks.
For example, every July Queen Elizabeth throws a
garden party at Buckingham Palace where about 8,000 of the great and good
stand around and wonder what to say to each other.
But this year was different. First there was
the frisson that Mary Archer attended, but thought it wise to leave behind her celebrity
husband Lord Jeffrey, released just that morning from two years jail for
perjury.
But greater excitement followed when a 17-year-old
guest suddenly became a royal streaker,
streaking across the hallowed lawns with his trousers around his ankles,
slapping his rear and shouting wahey.
Two ceremonial beefeaters, in full regalia, took off after him as he
dodged and swerved, but eventually one of them brought him down with a
valiant rugby tackle, as the other guests cheered. Formed in
1485, Beefeaters
are a pale equivalent of Saddams Special Republican Guard who exist
solely to protect the monarch and her palaces, hence the flying
tackle. But they are all retired military men, few under 60, and
action other than slow marching and regaling tourists is not really in
their job description.
And just last month, royalty were entertained by
Aaron Barschak, the comedy-terrorist, who gate-crashed
Prince Williams 21st birthday party dressed as a faux Osama bin Laden,
sang a song for him and generally livened up the proceedings.
Oh yes. These royal occasions are hotting
up.

Back
to Index
Quote of the Week
Quote
: We
are certain that Uday and Qusay were killed today.
Lt Gen Ricardo Sanchez,
commander of the US forces in
Iraq,
on Tuesday 22nd July 2003

Back
to Index
|
| SEE
THE ARCHIVE BAR AT THE TOP LEFT, FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE |
ISSUE
#47 - 20th July 2003
[124]
|
|
What Baghdadis
Really Think
Finally someone has stopped making unsubstantiated
statements of what the Iraqis want or dont want. Britains Channel 4 has just
conducted the first-ever opinion poll of Iraqis themselves, based on interviews, in
Arabic by specially trained Iraqis, of almost 800 people
across Baghdad, a city of 5
million. To ensure they are reasonably representative, they have
been selected from a range of age groups, occupations, sex, and
neighbourhoods of
Baghdad.
Since you can click for yourself on the detailed results and
Channel 4s official
summary, I have taken a slightly different
approach.
To the thirteen questions, a surprising percentage of responses (up to 31%) were
variants of dont
know or not sure.
Certainly some really didnt know. But I would speculate that after
30 years of Saddam and ongoing rumours
that he hasnt gone away you know,
quite a proportion Iraqis are still not comfortable with speaking their
minds to strangers,
particularly if their views are broadly anti-Saddam.
My analysis below
therefore strips out the dont-knows
to give what I believe is a more understandable and no less accurate
picture. Indeed, continuing fear of Saddam (rather than of
Americans) means that the green Yesses
are probably understated.
Opinions of 798 Representative Baghdadis
Excludes
answers of
no opinion, not stated, dont
know, not sure, none
of these

What do these
answers tell us ?
 |
That while there are still a large number of
objectors, there is nonetheless a very clear majority who
 |
favour the war, |
 |
are glad
of the foreign presence, but |
 |
want to be
governing themselves within the year. |
|
 |
This is despite the
substantial majority who reckon life in Iraq has become more dangerous and
generally worse than before the war. |
 |
These
contradictory findings are explained by their optimistic view of the future, ie
that life will get steadily better in the years ahead. |
The poll includes a further five multiple-choice questions
that do not lend themselves to yes/no answers. Broadly, they
indicate
 | cynicism about the purpose of the war (oil and
Israel rather than WMD and liberation); |
 | a preference and expectation for democracy or
modernised Islamic rule over dictatorship or Islamic theocracy; |
 |
that shortages of power, security, water and medical facilities
are their worst problems. |
This all re-emphasises that the battle to make Baghdad a less fearful city where
normal life can resume is vital not just for the immediate future but for
the longer-term task of rebuilding civil society. The appointment
last week of an interim
government to write a new constitution and to hold the first
democratic elections is a step of major significance. It comprises
25 Iraqis (three of them women) doctors, lawyers, teachers, engineers,
clerics, diplomats, political activists, businessmen and a judge, in rough
proportion to the countrys spectrum of ethnic and religious differences.
Encouragingly, it is
clear that for the first
time in many decades, the majority have hope for themselves, their
families, their nation. And for this they are prepared to endure the
temporary hardships and foreign occupation of today.
I find this a very
uplifting message and am surprised the survey has not been picked up by
many other broadcasters and publications. Perhaps theyre jealous of
Channel 4s pre-emptive scoop.
The poll will, of
course, disappoint the Western army of anti-warriors who rejoice at every
American setback or death, saying it proves the Iraqis dont want them, and would probably
prefer (as they do) Saddam.
But as Frank
McGahon quotes a Baghdadi on 18th July, a
visitor to Iraq these days never finds anyone who wants Saddam back ....
It will be interesting, meanwhile, to watch for
statistics of Iraqi expatriates and refugees returning to their
homeland. For this will constitute an irrefutable vote of confidence
(or otherwise) in the
future. By comparison, within a year of
the war that liberated Afghanistan from the Taliban and Al Qaeda, over two
million refugees had returned home to remake their lives.

Back
to Index
The
Public Bullying of David Kelly
David Kelly was a British chemical and biological weapons expert,
especially in relation to Iraq. He suddenly popped into the limelight just a couple of weeks ago when he
admitted to his bosses in the Ministry of Defence that he had met with the
BBCs reporter Andrew Gilligan in a London hotel and discussed Tony
Blairs now-famous dodgy
dossier. As such, he appeared to be the
source of Mr Gilligans story that Alistair Campbell had pressurised the
intelligence services, against their will, into inserting into the dossier
the claim that
Saddam could launch biological or chemical weapons within 45
minutes. The BBC strenuously denied that Mr Kelly was their source
(until today - 20th July - when they admitted it).
On 15th July, Dr Kelly was dragged before a televised parliamentary committee
investigating the claim. The committee treated him very
aggressively, particularly Andrew McKinlay a Labour MP. We can only speculate that the Ministry would not have
been gentle with him either. He had become the eye of the storm that
has been raging for six weeks between the BBC and Downing Street over the
45 minute claim. The pressure cracked him and poor man killed
himself on 18th July.
The same committee had a week or so earlier
interrogated Alistair Campbell. But he was
 |
not to be intimidated, |
 |
had his facts and figures immediately to hand, |
 |
responded robustly to every
question and |
 |
in fact made every questioner look foolish. |
The
Committee were unable to catch him out and clearly did not enjoy the
experience.
A similar Committee had a go at Tony Blair accusing
him of sending the country to war on false pretenses and likewise made no headway
in trying to get him to incriminate himself.
But Dr Kelly was a different kettle of fish.
There is no doubting his technical expertise;
and he apparently was an effective communicator in small groups, even in
negotiations with
the Saddamite regime. But he was out of his league when it came to
thinking on his feet in a public forum before a large group that was out to get him.
The parliamentary committee quickly sensed this.
Here was a civil servant who had already admitted
wrongdoing (talking to a journalist without permission). He was
clearly a rather timid, introverted, self-effacing man, overawed by the
proceedings. The Committee members pounced on him, like a schoolyard
bully. By
publicly humiliating Dr Kelly, they wrought revenge for having themselves been publicly humiliated by Mr Campbell
This was the last straw for the unfortunate Mr
Kelly. The Committees behaviour had been despicable.
Yet we should not forget that Dr Kelly himself set in
motion the train of events that resulted in tragedy. For he it was
who had chosen to speak to the press, as apparently he was rather wont to
do. Indeed his last e-mail was to a journalist with the New York
Times.
Nobody will come away from these events
untarnished.
To remind you, the British Government issued three
dossiers on Iraq, downloadable as PDF files :
-
Iraqs Weapons of Mass Destruction
- The Assessment of the British Government, September
2002 (427 kb)
 | The
first so-called dodgy dossier |
 | Up
to 60% of the document was allegedly
written by Dr Kelly |
 |
Contains
the now (in)famous claim that
Saddam could launch WMD within 45 minutes |
Saddam Hussein - Crimes and Human Rights Abuses,
December 2002 (197 kb)
Iraq - Its Infrastructure of Concealment, Deception and Intimidation,
January 2003 (205 kb)
 |
The
other so-called dodgy dossier |
 |
Contains
those extracts (in)famously plagiarised
from a
PhD students out-of-date thesis |
-------------------------------
Marcus writes to the effect that it is premature to
conclude that David Kellys death was suicide rather than murder.
See Letters.

Back
to Index
Who Was the Man
Who Never Was ?
Gerry ONeill is an elderly Irishman, now sadly gone blind, who joined the Merchant Marine and had a very colourful World War
2. He saw action in the trans-Atlantic convoys, in Russian convoys
to Murmansk, in North Africa, in the Pacific. He suffered a shipwreck,
escaped from the Japanese, and was badly wounded.
In his
memoirs which due to his blindness I edited and am currently publishing on my website (tallrite.com/oneill.htm), he tells
in chapter 7 the story of his assignment in
1943 to the SS
Lornaston. This was ostensibly a typical tramp steamer which plied up and down the south west coast of Spain between Gibraltar and Huelva bringing coal northward and iron ore south, one
days sailing each way.
But the shuttle was in fact a cover for
 |
delivering Allied spies to Huelva whence they made their way to France and elsewhere, and |
 |
repatriating via Gibraltar returning agents and escaped prisoners of war. |
For some reason, neutral Spain turned a blind eye to these proceedings despite the
Francoist pro-fascist pro-Nazi sentiments of the Huelva region.
This sympathy for the Axis powers was the main reason
that the British chose a beach near Huelva to float ashore, from a
clandestine submarine HMS Seraph, the dead body of a 34-year-old tramp who had killed himself with rat poison. The body was outfitted in the uniform of a
fictitious Major William Martin of the Royal Marines,
and chained to his hand was a briefcase containing documents titled Highly Secret and
Confidential.
Among them was a letter, allegedly from Churchill, advising one of his
commanders that the forthcoming invasion of Europe would be staged in Greece.
The body, with the briefcase attached, was picked up, as intended, by Spanish fishermen who alerted the Germans in Huelva. The Germans copied all the documents and replaced them in the briefcase before the local Spanish authorities were made aware of the discovery of the body.
In due course it was given to the British Consulate in the
town.
After checking the authenticity of the dead man and
of the documents (the matter was referred to Hitler himself), the Germans transferred several divisions from the Italy/Sicily area to Greece, so that when the first mainland invasion of Europe took place in Sicily, German resistance was vastly depleted and unprepared. The stratagem described here, which was codenamed Operation Mincemeat, received great publicity after the war by the book,
The Man Who Never Was, and in 1956 the movie.
Gerrys ship happened to be in Huelva when the body was discovered on the beach. A promise had apparently been made to the
mans parents, in London, before they
handed over the body for an unknown purpose, that the remains would receive a Christian burial. Accordingly, the British Vice-Consul in Huelva arranged to have this promise fulfilled,
and summoned the ships crew to attend the last rites at the Cemetery of Solitude outside Huelva. Later Gerry was charged with erecting a gravestone inscribed to Major Martin Williams.
But in 1996, the man was re-identified as Glyndwr Michael, the illegitimate son of illiterate Welsh parents and it is now doubtful that their permission was ever in fact sought. His true name was added to the gravestone.
On a purely personal and voluntary basis, the de Mendez family, living nearby, has tended the grave ever since burial in grateful recognition of the many Allied lives Glyndwr Michael saved.
Mrs Naylor de Mendez was deservedly awarded the MBE in 2002 for these efforts.
But the story still hasnt
ended. John and Noreen
Steele have written a book, The
Secrets of HMS Dasher, about a British aircraft carrier of this
name which
mysteriously sank off the west coast of Scotland in 1943. 379 sailors
died but the authors found a shortfall of one in their tally of
graves. This, combined with circumstantial evidence of dates, a
nighttime drive from London to Scotland, movements of the submarine HMS
Seraph and other research, led them to conclude that the body used in Mincemeat was
most likely to have been the missing sailor.
So take your choice. Was Major Martin really
:
 |
an unnamed tramp who killed himself with rat
poison, |
 |
the Welshman Glyndwr Michael, or |
 |
a drowned Royal Navy sailor from the aircraft carrier
? |
Well never know. But he lies in peace in
Huelva, 60 years after his posthumous heroic adventure. And my
friend Gerry ONeill is proud of his part in laying him to
rest.

Back
to Index
Moby
Dick and the Blob
Forehead to forehead, I meet thee this third time, cried Ahab,
captain of the whaleship Pequod, as the sperm whale Moby Dick moved
in to batter and
sink it.
That was fiction, but the sinking of two 200-ton whalers, the Essex
in 1821 and the Ann Alexander in 1851, by an enraged sperm whale
was not. Indeed it was these two incidents that inspired Herman
Melville to write his epic novel Moby Dick in 1851.
The sperm whale is the
largest of the toothed whales and dives deeper than any other. The
males measure up to 65 feet in length and weigh about 50 tonnes.
It
gets its name from a huge bulbous organ, a kind of forehead,
called the spermaceti that sits above and protrudes beyond its upper jaw (click
on the thumbnail to view the image full size). It contains an insoluble, non-putrefying, milky wax which early whalers likened to sperm
fluid. Today, it is employed mostly in ointments, cosmetics and fine candles,
but used to be the waterproofing medium for oilskins.
Biologists in the University of Utah recently concluded
that the spermaceti actually evolved to be a weapon, a battering ram, in
male-male aggression over access to females. It was this aggression combined with this tool
that sank the three ships, and caused damage to many others.
Nevertheless, it
is also the cause of its near-extinction by whalers in the 19th century
who highly prized the milky wax and blubber it contained, and hunted it
without mercy until anti-whaling covenants were first signed in 1935.
Even so, low-level whaling continued until a general moratorium took effect in
1986, which Norway
and Japan continue however to flout.
Which brings me to the blob. Remember that huge,
pinkish-grey, blob
of slimy, gelatinous, hard-to-cut tissue 40 feet long and resembling a squashed
elephant, found on a beach in Chile, 680 miles south of Santiago ?
(Click
on the thumbnail)
It
had either dropped from the sky (Martians ?) or come out of the Pacific
Ocean. Many thought it might be an Octopus
Giganteus, or Globster, which was recorded for the first and only time
on a Florida beach in 1896,
and which has confounded experts ever since.
Well, chunks of the blob were sent for identification to specialists in France, the
United States and Santiago.
And its the Chilean researchers, at Santiagos Museum of Natural History,
that have solved the mystery. They have concluded
that it is, in fact, part of the carcass of a sperm whale, specifically
the spermaceti.
When a sperm whale dies at sea, it rots until it becomes a skeleton suspended in a semi-liquid mass within a bag of skin and
blubber,
the scientists said, holding their noses. Eventually, the skin tears and the
bones sink while the skin and blubber float. Washed up on shore,
the stuff has the appearance of an octopus (or elephant) because the
spermaceti organ keeps its bulky shape and does not rot.
So there you have it. Literature, history, science, current affairs and
a mystery solved, all in one short article.

Back
to Index
When
Bigshots Try to Hide
Letters to the press, be it in Ireland, UK or
elsewhere, periodically recount frustration on the part of ordinary
citizens when they try to ask questions of bashful civil servants or shop
managers or other such service-provider bosses. Weve all
experienced something similar. Most recently,
Audrey Dillon in the (subscription-only) Irish Times relates
her repeated and fruitless phone calls and letters to the civil service
seeking some simple information.
Here is my sister Frances proven method to get
results.
 |
Pack into a small bag a newspaper, a thick novel,
a pack of sandwiches and a thermos flask of coffee. |
 |
Arrive at the office of the person you wish to
see at 9 am sharp. |
 |
When told he/she is busy or not arrived yet,
smile sweetly, say youre happy to wait and take a seat. |
 |
Get out your newspaper, pour yourself a cup of
coffee and wait patiently and politely.
 |
Have a sandwich if youre hungry. |
 |
Read the book when youve finished the paper. |
|
 |
Stand up expectantly and cheerily every time
someone enters or leaves your quarrys office. |
I guarantee that before 5 pm the person you are
seeking will
have cracked. He/she will see you. It always works.
And if it doesnt, simply repeat the procedure the
next day.

Back
to Index
Sex and the
Cybersquatter
I happened to hear an interview on
Irelands Today FM radio
station last week (18th July) with a Californian entrepreneur called Gary Kremen.
With
great foresight, he had acquired the domain-name sex.com back in
1994.
But he didnt make immediate use of it because at the same
time he also acquired match.com and used it set up an online
dating agency which turned out to be highly successful, having
brokered 20,000
marriages up to now. (Thats why he calls himself historys greatest
match-maker).
Now there are lots of nasty and nefarious
things you can do to a website - crack it, hijack it, black it out - but
one thing you cant do, no matter how evil your intention, is steal its
domain name. Except you can.
For in 1995, convicted fraudster Stephen Michael
Cohen managed to steal sex.com using forged documents, and wasted no time
in using it to set up his own website.
His business idea was that
most people looking for sex on the internet will type in the word sex
which will more than likely bring them to sex.com. The site then provided links to
various pornographic sites which paid Mr Cohen handsomely - up to $1m per
month - for the referrals. The payment method is per click,
usually between 5 and 15 cents, so he must have been generating around
5,000 clicks an hour, round the clock.
When Mr Kremen found out about this cyber-squatting,
he set about chasing Mr Cohen through the California courts. He eventually won,
but it cost him six long years and $4.4 million in legal fees before the appeals
process was finally exhausted last month.
He
was awarded a massive $65
million in lost revenue and damages, whereupon Mr Cohen understandably
disappeared, apparently to Tijuana in Mexico, with his ill-gotten loot safely stashed
in Jersey, the Isle of Man, Liechtenstein and such like banking havens. Mr
Kremen, who wants his $65m, is offering a reward of $50,000,
which he said is readily negotiable upwards, to anyone who can find the
fugitive and get him arrested.
Why
he went on to an obscure Irish radio station with all this I have no idea,
unless he has a hunch that Mr Cohen is roaming around Ireland.
Ill
be keeping my eyes open.
Meanwhile,
Mr Kremen says he has revamped
sex.com into a more moral service providing links
only to more wholesome pornographic sites than those
featuring the sadists, children and
animals apparently favoured by Mr Cohen. Hmmm.
Salaciousness
apart, it is a landmark case. For it has established that a
domain-name is in law a piece
of property, whose owner has similar rights to a bricks-and-mortar
landlord.
So,
hands off tallrite.com please.

Back
to Index
Quote of the Week
Quote
: [The]
theory ... that we need to balance the power of America with other
competitive powers ... is an anachronism to be discarded ... If Europe and
America split ... nothing but mischief will be the result ... To be a
serious partner Europe must defeat the anti-Americanism that sometimes
passes for its political discourse ... [But] dont give up on Europe.
Anywhere,
any time ordinary people are given the chance to choose, the choice is the
same :
 |
freedom, not tyranny; |
 |
democracy, not dictatorship; |
 |
the rule of law,
not the rule of the secret police.
|
Tony Blair addressing both houses of the US
Congress
on Thursday 17th July 2003

Back
to Index
|
| SEE
THE ARCHIVE BAR AT THE TOP LEFT, FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE |
ISSUE
#46 - 13th July 2003
[133]
|
|
Fuel Shortage in a Land of
OIl
Before civil war broke out in
Nigeria in 1967, it was producing about one million barrels a day of
oil. Wars end in 1970 was followed by a frenetic round of oilfield
activity - running seismic, drilling wells, building roads, constructing
pumping stations, laying pipelines. In about three short years this
boom not
only re-established the pre-war production rate but doubled
it. I know; I was there for all of it.
Though production has remained at around 2
mb/d ever since, subsequent new discoveries have long meant that with
sufficient investment it could double again to 4
mb/d. But this has not happened because the Nigerian Government,
which is a partner with oil companies in all production ventures, has been perennially
unable or unwilling to pay its share of the necessary investment. But
thats
another story.
Nigerias own oil consumption is 240,000 b/d; the
capacity of its refineries twice that.

Oh, and apart from oil, it exports 252.4
billion cubic feet a year of liquefied natural gas, which in energy terms is equivalent to
another 120,000 b/d of oil.
So, by any measure, there is
 | | |