Blog
Click to access RSS
Archive

7/08

6/08

5/08

4/08

3/08

2/08

1/08

12/07

11/07

10/07

9/07

8/07

7/07

6/07

5/07

4/07

3/07

2/07

1/07

12/06

11/06

10/06

9/06

8/06

7/06

6/06

5/06

4/06

3/06

2/06

1/06

12/05

11/05

10/05

9/05

8/05

7/05

6/05

5/05

4/05

3/05

2/05

1/05

12/04

11/04

10/04

9/04

8/04

7/04

6/04

5/04

4/04

3/04

2/04

1/04

12/03

11/03

10/03

9/03

8/03

7/03

6/03

5/03

4/03

3/03

2/03

1/03

12/02

11/02

10/02

9/02

8/02

7/02

Indexes
>Time
>Alphabet

Letters
Blog
To find an archived article, simply click on Index and scroll the subject titles, or do a Ctrl-F search

TALLRITE BLOG 
ARCHIVE

This archive contains all issues prior to the current week and the three preceding weeks, which are published in 
the main Tallrite Blog (www.tallrite.com/blog.htm).  
The first issue appeared on Sunday 14th July 2002

You can write to blog@tallrite.com

July 2003
bulletISSUE #45 - 6th July 2003
bulletISSUE #46 - 13th July 2003 
bulletISSUE #47 - 20th July 2003
bulletISSUE #48 - 27th July 2003

ISSUE #48 - 27th July 2003 [ 226]

bulletLiberia - How Did It Get Where It Is ?
bulletPhotographing Uday and Qusay
bulletDown With Tanya Streeter
bullet Bombe Surprise at Toulouse Airport2
bulletWinning Streak Causes Royal Flush
bulletQuote of the Week

Liberia - How Did It Get Where It Is ?

Ryszard Kapuscinski tells us that in 1821, Robert Stockton, an agent of the American Colonization Society, arrived in what is now Monrovia and forced the local tribal chief, King Peter, to sell - for six muskets and a trunk of beads - what is now Liberia.  This was to settle slaves freed from the cotton plantations of the southern USA, as a charitable reparation for the crime of slavery. 

From then on, liberated slaves were shipped in until by 1847, when the Republic of Liberia was proclaimed with a US-style constitution, there were 6,000 of them, though they  amounted to just 1% of the country’s population.  

The fate and behaviour of these settlers, who called themselves Americo-Liberians, is fascinating.

They did not know how to read or write, had no trade or professional skills and had never had any legal rights. 

Post-publication Note (28th July)
Reader Donnah takes issue with some of the above and provides this academic link.   I can’t agree with your history of Liberian settlement, she says. They weren’t all from the South, and at least half were literate. Almost half were freeborn. Four different societies had settlements. It’s just not so simple as you have it.”  But this does not materially affect the remainder of this brief history of Liberia.  

Nevertheless, suddenly they found themselves, bewildered and left to their own fate, in an Africa they didn’t know among indigenous blacks they had nothing in common with but their colour.  

The only non-family relationship they knew was master-to-slave.  Their first move upon arrival, therefore, was to re-create precisely that social structure, only now they, the slaves of yesterday, became the masters, and they set out to enslave the locals.  They did not wish to abolish an unjust order, but wanted to preserve it and exploit it for their own benefit. They simply could not  imagine a world in which all would be free.

A large portion of Liberia was covered in thick, tropical, humid, malarial jungle, inhabited by small, impoverished and weakly organized tribes.  Relations with the newcomers from across the ocean were hostile from the start.  The Americo-Liberians quickly proclaimed that only they could be citizens, not the other 99% whom they categorised as uncultured tribesmen, savage, heathen.

The two groups lived far apart, for the new masters stuck to coastal settlements, of which Monrovia was the largest.  It was over 100 years before the first president, William Tubman, in 1947, ventured into the interior

Since everyone looked ethnically similar, the newcomers would underline their difference and superiority by promenading in morning coats and white gloves, the ladies in heavy wigs and grand hats.  They built Gone-With-the-Wind style southern mansions to live in, worshiped in churches closed to the natives, attended exclusive private clubs.  Close contact with the locals, particularly inter-marriage, was forbidden.  Locals were confined to tribal homelands.  Dissidence was used as an excuse to punish and execute troublemakers, destroy their villages and crops and above all capture slaves.  The slaves were put to work on the Americo-Liberians’ farms and businesses and exported to Fernando Po and Guinea.  Only in 1920 was slavery officially abolished but it nevertheless continued with stealth, barely unabated. 

The Americo-Liberians established a Leninist-style one-party state under the True Whig Party that maintained dictatorial monopoly power for 111 years until 1980.  You could achieve something only if you were a member of the party; opponents ended up in prison, dead or abroad. 

From 1944 to 1971, William Tubman was the boss of the True Whig Party, and thus automatically Liberia’s president.  He ruled the country like a manor squire, hearing petitions from his countrymen, dispatching his secret police, knowing and deciding everything. 

People believed he possessed magical powers : 

bullet

If someone handed him a poisoned drink, the glass would shatter; 

bullet

an assassin’s bullet would melt in mid-air; 

bullet

special herbs allowed him to win every election; and

bullet

he could see everything that was happening, anywhere - so there was no sense in conspiracy, since it would always be found out.

When he died, his vice-president William Tolbert took over. Whereas Tubman loved power, for Tolbert is was money from any source - gold, cars, passports, rackets. The entire élite, those descendants of black American slaves, followed his example. People who begged in the street for bread or water were shot on Tolbert’s orders. His police killed hundreds.

Then early on 12th April 1980, seventeen lowly soldiers barged into the president’s villa to demand unpaid wages, found Tolbert in bed and on an impulse hacked him to pieces. They disemboweled him and threw his internal organs out into the courtyard for the dogs and vultures.  Their leader was a 28 year-old sergeant, Samuel Doe. He was barely literate, from the small tribe of Krahn, which lived deep in the jungle. He was just one of thousands of people who for years had been trekking from the interior into Monrovia, in search of work and money, though there was very little of either. They were ready fodder for any local chieftain or gangster or indeed the army, looking for low-cost muscle. 

Doe immediately declared himself president, the first non-Americo-Liberian, and in one sense represented a liberation of the locals from those hated rulers descended from American slaves.

He quickly staged a public execution of thirteen Tolbert ministers.  This set the scene for a decade of despotic rule dominated by his need to amass money and eliminate opponents.  For both these ends, he surrounded himself with primitive fellow-Krahn tribesmen suddenly summoned in large numbers from the jungle.  They in turn quickly learnt the art of accumulating money and consolidating their position by killing non-Krahn.  Most of the former élite, the Americo-Liberians, used their wealth to flee the country. 

But under Doe, the country progressed not an iota. 

bullet

He was lazy, 

bullet

spent long hours playing chequers with his subordinates, 

bullet

knew and cared nothing of economics and politics.  

Then along came the present-day president, Charles Taylor, who after a period in and out of jail in the USA, launched a war in 1989 against the by-now hugely unpopular Doe, who was once his friend.  Doe sent out an army of his Krahn, but instead of fighting Taylor, they went on a spree of indiscriminate plunder.  This caused the terrified populace to flee to the cause of Taylor who with a much enlarged army quickly arrived at the outskirts of Monrovia. 

At this point, Taylor’s chief of staff, Prince Johnson, another of Doe’s ex-friends, broke away and formed his own army so that there was now a three-way civil war going on. 

In 1990, Johnson managed to ambush and capture Doe, whom he interrogated and tortured to death, including cutting off his ears, while filming the proceedings in loving detail.  The inquisition had only one purpose : to find out the number of his private bank account where the booty from his ten years of misrule was stashed. Indeed such booty has long been the reward of Liberia’s presidents and thus the attraction of supplanting them.  

The civil war progressed, with an African, mainly Nigerian, interventionist force, ECOMOG, becoming a fourth and dominant combatant (and one with its own special interest in plunder, earning it the nickname Every Car Or Moveable Object Gone”).  

Eventually ECOMOG seized Monrovia but the rest of the country descended into the chaotic grip of Taylor and like-minded warlords who carved out their own fiefs and whose principal objective was to garner money - from natural resources, from tolls, from businesses, from state institutions, from international aid and from the poor wretches unlucky enough to be living within their respective purviews. 

But as the pillage ran dry, a peace treaty was signed in 1995, resulting in the election of Taylor as president, the withdrawal of ECOMOG and a fresh influx of international aid money available for looting. 

Fighting within the country did not stop, however, but spread to international meddling, as Taylor supported, and traded arms for diamonds with, rebels fighting in Sierra Leone, Guinea and Côte d’Ivoire, earning him a UN indictment for war crimes.  At the same time, rebels within Liberia, many aided by brutal Sierra Leone and Guinea government troops, began to make territorial gains, killing and displacing thousands of Liberians.  They called themselves Liberians United for Reconciliation and Democracy (LURD), a typical soubriquet for an unruly bunch interested in neither reconciliation nor democracy.  

The current LURD civil war - insofar as this term implies that one Liberian civil war has been different from another - is about nothing.  

bulletNo rebel is saying the current government is corrupt or incompetent (though it is both).  
bulletThis is no conflict been leftist Marxists/Maoists and right-wing capitalists.  
bulletThe only ideological struggle Liberia has known has been between the original impoverished natives and the élite Americo-Liberians but the latter have long since decamped.

So the only issue at stake is who operates the levers of power and therefore has access to the pitiful bit of wealth that still remains in Liberia.  The LURD renegades reckon Charles Taylor has had long enough at the trough and now it is someone else’s turn.  

And right now they are encroaching on Monrovia itself, creating the current panic, city-centre shell-fire, street-killings and calls for intervention by ECOMOG and the US. 

With America’s unpopularity, struggles and daily losses in Iraq and the confidence-sapping history of Liberian corruption and civil war, it is little wonder that President Bush is hesitating before sending in his army and is at least insisting that ECOMOG does so first.  

Charles Taylor has said he will step down; Nigeria’s president has offered him asylum.   

But there is little doubt he will hang on as doggedly as Saddam Hussein did, and will leave only when someone forces him to.  America understands all about regime-change and nation-rebuilding, but whether Bush has the stomach for a third such foray is a different matter.  Especially when the prognosis for long-term improvement is so bleak.  

So the agony of ordinary Liberians continues.  

Read this alternative brief history of Liberia to get a few additional details from war-correspondent Richard Krantz.  

Back to Index

Photographing Uday and Qusay

An awful lot of western liberal bluster followed the publication of those rather gruesome post-mortem photos of Saddam’s odious sons Uday and Qusay.  Disgusting, unnecessary, pandering to perversion, against the Geneva Convention etc.   

I was reminded of what happened at the end of World War 2.  As the Soviets invaded Berlin, Adolf Hitler (and his new wife Eva Braun) blew their brains out.  Or so it was said, since Hitler’s corpse was apparently never found.  As a result, the Nazi underground - and not only in Germany - continued resisting for a lot longer than it might have done, because those closet Nazis lived in hopes that the Fuhrer would reappear and lead them back to greatness.  There were many sightings” of Hitler in South America and elsewhere, almost as many as Elvis sightings.  

Had photos of Hitler’s corpse been distributed across the country, or his corpse been displayed as Mussolini’s upturned body was, it would have been very different.  Just as Italy’s fascists disappeared overnight with the indisputable elimination of their Duce, hopelessness would have also overtaken those Nazi dissidents, and Germany’s de-Nazification process would have been faster and smoother.  

Ironically, it emerged after the fall of the Soviet Union, that the Russians had in fact found Hitler’s body, cut off the head and brought it back to Moscow.  But this was all kept secret.  

Learning therefore from Germany and Italy, it is important to convince everyone in Iraq that the sons are gone, in order both to

bullet

bring despair to remaining Ba’athists and bring home to them the hopelessness of continuing any rear-guard action, and 

bullet

remove or reduce fear of Saddam’s return for the vast majority of Iraqis who are of good will.  

The more photos and video clips of the bodies the better.  And it was right to shave them and clean them up so as to look as much as possible like they did in life.  

Tasteful ?  No.  Necessary ?  Yes. 

A niggling question however troubles me.   Instead of winning their victory with 200 men in a six-hour gunbattle, why did the Americans not simply lay siege to that villa in Mosul ?  There were only four, lightly armed people in the house.  With patience, in maybe a week, maybe a month, surely they could have been taken alive.  

bullet

This would have allowed much valuable intelligence to be gleaned, not least about Saddam himself and the WMD programme.  

bullet

Equally, the brothers could have been put on trial for their war crimes in a public display of justice akin to the Nuremburg trials.  

Remember Waco and the siege of the Branch Davidian compound in 1993 ?  How in a fit of impatience the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms went in shooting and precipitated the deaths of 56 cult members plus 20 children ?  The Americans do not seem very good in the patience department, more’s the pity.  

Back to Index

Down With Tanya Streeter

Last October, I reported on the tragic death of Audrey Mestre while attempting to break the the “No Limits” world record for so-called free diving, that is, diving without breathing apparatus.  There are now five categories where records are awarded, by either or both of two free-dive organizations, the IAFD and the AIDA (who don’t always recognize each other’s records).   

  1. Constant Ballast or Constant Weight : Diving without any external aids other than flippers and mask.  The world record for this is 87 metres, set in April 2002.  
  2. Variable Weight : Dragging yourself down a rope anchored to the bottom.  Record 131 meters, November 2001.  
  3. No Limits  : Allowing yourself to be pulled down the rope by a 200 lb weight and brought back to the surface with the help of an inflatable balloon.  The record for this is 162 metres, or 170 metres if Audrey’s fatal attempt is counted. 
  4. Variable Ballast : Allowing yourself to be pulled down the rope by a 200 lb weight but swimming back to the surface with no external aid other than flippers.  Record 95 metres (women) and 120 metres (men).  
  5. Constant Weight / No Fins, where you dive with no swimming aids at all - no weights, fins or mask.  This strenuous category was established only in January 2003.  

Last week, in a fanfare of ballyhoo, Tanya Streeter, in waters off the  Turks and Caicos Islands, a tiny British colony in the Caribbean - 

bullet

broke the all-comers world record for category 4 with an astonishing dive to 122 metres, lasting over 3½ minutes. 

bullet

And just the following day, set another world record, in category 5, reaching 35 metres in a dive of 1¾ minutes.  It was her ninth world record.  

Commenting on her dives compared to Audrey’s, she points out that she did 17 training dives and had 14 safety divers.  By contrast Audrey had only three of either.  She reckons that had Audrey’s fatal plunge taken place in the US or UK, criminal negligence charges would have followed.  In other words, the death was avoidable.  

Meanwhile, the Turks & Caicos government are so thrilled with the publicity caused by her dives, they are going to feature her on a set of five stamps, the first living person other than royalty to be accorded such an honour. 

Back to Index

Bombe Surprise at Toulouse Airport

We have to be more careful than we might think when packing to fly off for our foreign vacations these days.  We all know we’re no longer supposed to pack camping gaz or barbecue lighter fluid or chain-saws or firecrackers or countless other frivolous things needed to lighten up our holidays.   

And when our hand baggage is searched, deadly items such as nail scissors or corkscrews will be confiscated so that all we’re left with to stage our hijacking is breakable glass bottles of inflammable vodka from the duty free shop.  

But Gail Brooker, 53, who owns a guest house in England discovered another no-no.  Last week, she accidentally left her blue rucksack at Toulouse airport but when she tried to phone the airport she found it was closed.  So her boyfriend drove back to the airport next day to look for it, only to be told it had ... exploded.  That’s why the airport had been closed.  No-one was laughing.  

It seems the abandoned bag was put through an X-Ray machine which revealed that as well as ordinary things like socks, underwear and a camera, it contained a quantity of Semtex, the terrorists’ favourite plastic explosive.  So the authorities quite properly took the bag to a safe place and blew it up.  

Only the Semtex wasn’t Semtex.  It was puff pastry.  They look exactly the same.  Gail had packed some in her bag because she could never find decent pastry in French supermarkets.  There were four people in her group and she wanted to cook them her speciality - chicken pie.  

Some time ago, I described some of the latest developments in airport scanning technology - the mind-reader, the blush-detector and the naked body revealer.  But Gail has shown the need for someone to invent a puff-pastry-sniffer.  

So until then be warned.  No nail clippers, no corkscrews, and definitely no puff pastry.  

Back to Index

Winning Streak Causes Royal Flush

Britain’s royal occasions have a well deserved reputation for being turgid affairs; it is rare that anything happens that might redden royal cheeks.  

For example, every July Queen Elizabeth throws a garden party at Buckingham Palace where about 8,000 of the great and good stand around and wonder what to say to each other.  

But this year was different.  First there was the frisson that Mary Archer attended, but thought it wise to leave behind her celebrity husband Lord Jeffrey, released just that morning from two years jail for perjury.  

But greater excitement followed when a 17-year-old guest suddenly became a royal streaker, streaking across the hallowed lawns with his trousers around his ankles, slapping his rear and shouting wahey.    Two ceremonial beefeaters, in full regalia, took off after him as he dodged and swerved, but eventually one of them brought him down with a valiant rugby tackle, as the other guests cheered.   Formed in 1485, Beefeaters are a pale equivalent of Saddam’s Special Republican Guard who exist solely to protect the monarch and her palaces, hence the flying tackle.  But they are all retired military men, few under 60, and action other than slow marching and regaling tourists is not really in their job description.  

And just last month, royalty were entertained by Aaron Barschak, the comedy-terrorist, who gate-crashed Prince William’s 21st birthday party dressed as a faux Osama bin Laden, sang a song for him and generally livened up the proceedings.  

Oh yes.  These royal occasions are hotting up.  

Back to Index

Quote of the Week

Quote : We are certain that Uday and Qusay were killed today.

Lt Gen Ricardo Sanchez, 
commander of the US forces in Iraq, 
on Tuesday 22nd July 2003

Back to Index

SEE THE ARCHIVE BAR AT THE TOP LEFT, FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE

ISSUE #47 - 20th July 2003 [124]

bulletWhat Baghdadis Really Think
bulletThe Public Bullying of David Kelly
bulletWho Was the Man Who Never Was ?
bulletMoby Dick and the Blob
bulletWhen Bigshots Try to Hide
bulletSex and the Cybersquatter
bulletQuote of the Week

What Baghdadis Really Think

Finally someone has stopped making unsubstantiated statements of what the Iraqis want or don’t want.  Britain’s Channel 4 has just conducted the first-ever opinion poll of Iraqis themselves, based on interviews, in Arabic by specially trained Iraqis, of almost 800 people across Baghdad, a city of 5 million.  To ensure they are reasonably representative, they have been selected from a range of age groups, occupations, sex, and neighbourhoods of Baghdad.  

Since you can click for yourself on the detailed results and Channel 4’s official summary, I have taken a slightly different approach.  

To the thirteen questions, a surprising percentage of responses (up to 31%) were variants of don’t know” or “not sure”.  Certainly some really didn’t know.  But I would speculate that after 30 years of Saddam and ongoing rumours that he hasn’t gone away you know”, quite a proportion Iraqis are still not comfortable with speaking their minds to strangers, particularly if their views are broadly anti-Saddam.  

My analysis below therefore strips out the don’t-knows” to give what I believe is a more understandable and no less accurate picture.  Indeed, continuing fear of Saddam (rather than of Americans) means that the green Yesses are probably understated.    

Opinions of 798 Representative Baghdadis
Excludes answers of 
“no opinion”, “not stated”, don’t know”, “not sure”, “none of these”

What do these answers tell us ?  

bullet

That while there are still a large number of objectors, there is nonetheless a very clear majority who 
bullet

favour the war, 

bullet

are glad of the foreign presence, but

bullet

want to be governing themselves within the year.  

bullet

This is despite the substantial majority who reckon life in Iraq has become more dangerous and generally worse than before the war.  

bullet

These contradictory findings are explained by their optimistic view of the future, ie that life will get steadily better in the years ahead.  

The poll includes a further five multiple-choice questions that do not lend themselves to yes/no answers.  Broadly, they indicate 

bullet

cynicism about the purpose of the war (oil and Israel rather than WMD and liberation); 

bullet

a preference and expectation for democracy or modernised Islamic rule over dictatorship or Islamic theocracy; 

bullet

that shortages of power, security, water and medical facilities are their worst problems.  

This all re-emphasises that the battle to make Baghdad a less fearful city where normal life can resume is vital not just for the immediate future but for the longer-term task of rebuilding civil society.  The appointment last week of an interim government to write a new constitution and to hold the first democratic elections is a step of major significance.  It comprises 25 Iraqis (three of them women) — doctors, lawyers, teachers, engineers, clerics, diplomats, political activists, businessmen and a judge, in rough proportion to the country’s spectrum of ethnic and religious differences.  

Encouragingly, it is clear that for the first time in many decades, the majority have hope for themselves, their families, their nation.  And for this they are prepared to endure the temporary hardships and foreign occupation of today.  

I find this a very uplifting message and am surprised the survey has not been picked up by many other broadcasters and publications.  Perhaps they’re jealous of Channel 4’s pre-emptive scoop.  

The poll will, of course, disappoint the Western army of anti-warriors who rejoice at every American setback or death, saying it proves the Iraqis don’t want them, and would probably prefer (as they do) Saddam.  

But as Frank McGahon quotes a Baghdadi on 18th July, a visitor to Iraq these days never finds anyone who wants Saddam back ....

It will be interesting, meanwhile, to watch for statistics of Iraqi expatriates and refugees returning to their homeland.  For this will constitute an irrefutable vote of confidence (or otherwise) in the future.  By comparison, within a year of the war that liberated Afghanistan from the Taliban and Al Qaeda, over two million refugees had returned home to remake their lives.  

Back to Index

The Public Bullying of David Kelly

David Kelly was a British chemical and biological weapons expert, especially in relation to Iraq.  He suddenly popped into the limelight just a couple of weeks ago when he admitted to his bosses in the Ministry of Defence that he had met with the BBC’s reporter Andrew Gilligan in a London hotel and discussed Tony Blair’s now-famous dodgy dossier.  As such, he appeared to be the source of Mr Gilligan’s story that Alistair Campbell had pressurised the intelligence services, against their will, into inserting into the dossier the claim that Saddam could launch biological or chemical weapons within 45 minutes.  The BBC strenuously denied that Mr Kelly was their source (until today -  20th July - when they admitted it).  

On 15th July, Dr Kelly was dragged before a televised parliamentary committee investigating the claim.  The  committee treated him very aggressively, particularly Andrew McKinlay a Labour MP.  We can only speculate that the Ministry would not have been gentle with him either.  He had become the eye of the storm that has been raging for six weeks between the BBC and Downing Street over the 45 minute claim.  The pressure cracked him and poor man killed himself on 18th July.  

The same committee had a week or so earlier interrogated Alistair Campbell.  But he was 

bullet

not to be intimidated, 

bullet

had his facts and figures immediately to hand, 

bullet

responded robustly to every question and 

bullet

in fact made every questioner look foolish.  

The Committee were unable to catch him out and clearly did not enjoy the experience.  

A similar Committee had a go at Tony Blair accusing him of sending the country to war on false pretenses and likewise made no headway in trying to get him to incriminate himself.   

But Dr Kelly was a different kettle of fish.  

There is no doubting his technical expertise; and he apparently was an effective communicator in small groups, even in negotiations with the Saddamite regime.  But he was out of his league when it came to thinking on his feet in a public forum before a large group that was out to get him.  The parliamentary committee quickly sensed this.  

Here was a civil servant who had already admitted wrongdoing (talking to a journalist without permission).  He was clearly a rather timid, introverted, self-effacing man, overawed by the proceedings.  The Committee members pounced on him, like a schoolyard bully.  By publicly humiliating Dr Kelly, they wrought revenge for having themselves been publicly humiliated by Mr Campbell 

This was the last straw for the unfortunate Mr Kelly.  The Committee’s behaviour had been despicable.  

Yet we should not forget that Dr Kelly himself set in motion the train of events that resulted in tragedy.  For he it was who had chosen to speak to the press, as apparently he was rather wont to do.  Indeed his last e-mail was to a journalist with the New York Times.  

Nobody will come away from these events untarnished.  

To remind you, the British Government issued three dossiers on Iraq, downloadable as PDF files : 

  1. Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction - The Assessment of the British Government”, September 2002 (427 kb)
    bullet

    The first so-called “dodgy dossier

    bullet

    Up to 60% of the document was allegedly 
    written by Dr Kelly

    bullet

    Contains the now (in)famous claim that 
    Saddam could launch WMD “within 45 minutes

  2. Saddam Hussein - Crimes and Human Rights Abuses, December 2002 (197 kb)
    bullet

    Amnesty International hypocritically objected 
    to the inclusion of their data as part of the 
    justification for war

  3. Iraq - Its Infrastructure of Concealment, Deception and Intimidation”, January 2003 (205 kb)
    bullet

    The other so-called “dodgy dossier

    bullet

    Contains those extracts (in)famously plagiarised 
    from a PhD student’s out-of-date thesis

-------------------------------

Marcus writes to the effect that it is premature to conclude that David Kelly’s death was suicide rather than murder.  See Letters.  

Back to Index

Who Was the Man Who Never Was ?

Gerry O’Neill is an elderly Irishman, now sadly gone blind, who joined the Merchant Marine and had a very colourful World War 2.  He saw action in the trans-Atlantic convoys, in Russian convoys to Murmansk, in North Africa, in the Pacific.  He suffered a shipwreck, escaped from the Japanese, and was badly wounded.

In his memoirs which due to his blindness I edited and am currently publishing on my website (tallrite.com/oneill.htm), he tells in chapter 7 the story of his assignment in Sailing between Gibraltar and Huelva, with a cargo of coal, spies and POWs. Click to enlarge 1943 to the SS Lornaston. This was ostensibly a typical tramp steamer which plied up and down the south west coast of Spain between Gibraltar and Huelva bringing coal northward and iron ore south, one day’s sailing each way. 

But the shuttle was in fact a cover for 

bullet

delivering Allied spies to Huelva whence they made their way to France and elsewhere, and 

bullet

repatriating via Gibraltar returning agents and escaped prisoners of war.   

For some reason, neutral Spain turned a blind eye to these proceedings despite the Francoist pro-fascist pro-Nazi sentiments of the Huelva region. 

This sympathy for the Axis powers was the main reason that the British chose a beach near Huelva to float ashore, from a clandestine submarine HMS Seraph, the dead body of a 34-year-old tramp who had killed himself with rat poison. The body was outfitted in the uniform of a fictitious Major William Martin of the Royal Marines, and chained to his hand was a briefcase containing documents titled Highly Secret and Confidential.  Among them was a letter, allegedly from Churchill, advising one of his commanders that the forthcoming invasion of Europe would be staged in Greece. 

The body, with the briefcase attached, was picked up, as intended, by Spanish fishermen who alerted the Germans in Huelva. The Germans copied all the documents and replaced them in the briefcase before the local Spanish authorities were made aware of the discovery of the body.   In due course it was given to the British Consulate in the town.  

After checking the authenticity of the dead man and of the documents (the matter was referred to Hitler himself), the Germans transferred several divisions from the Italy/Sicily area to Greece, so that when the first mainland invasion of Europe took place in Sicily, German resistance was vastly depleted and unprepared. The stratagem described here, which was codenamed Operation Mincemeat, received great publicity after the war by the book, The Man Who Never Was, and in 1956 the movie.

The Man Who Never Was. Who was he? Click to enlargeGerry’s ship happened to be in Huelva when the body was discovered on the beach. A promise had apparently been made to the man’s parents, in London, before they handed over the body for an unknown purpose, that the remains would receive a Christian burial. Accordingly, the British Vice-Consul in Huelva arranged to have this promise fulfilled, and summoned the ship’s crew to attend the last rites at the Cemetery of Solitude outside Huelva. Later Gerry was charged with erecting a gravestone inscribed to Major Martin Williams. 

But in 1996, the man was re-identified as Glyndwr Michael, the illegitimate son of illiterate Welsh parents and it is now doubtful that their permission was ever in fact sought. His true name was added to the gravestone. 

On a purely personal and voluntary basis, the de Mendez family, living nearby, has tended the grave ever since burial in grateful recognition of the many Allied lives Glyndwr Michael saved.  Mrs Naylor de Mendez was deservedly awarded the MBE in 2002 for these efforts. 

But the story still hasn’t ended.  John and Noreen Steele have written a book, The Secrets of HMS Dasher, about a British aircraft carrier of this name which mysteriously sank off the west coast of Scotland in 1943.  379 sailors died but the authors found a shortfall of one in their tally of graves.  This, combined with circumstantial evidence of dates, a nighttime drive from London to Scotland, movements of the submarine HMS Seraph and other research, led them to conclude that the body used in Mincemeat was most likely to have been the missing sailor.  

So take your choice.  Was Major Martin really : 

bullet

an unnamed tramp who killed himself with rat poison,  

bullet

the Welshman Glyndwr Michael, or

bullet

a drowned Royal Navy sailor from the aircraft carrier ?  

We’ll never know.  But he lies in peace in Huelva, 60 years after his posthumous heroic adventure.  And my friend Gerry O’Neill is proud of his part in laying him to rest.  

Back to Index

Moby Dick and the Blob

Forehead to forehead, I meet thee this third time, cried Ahab, captain of the whaleship Pequod, as the sperm whale Moby Dick moved in to batter and sink it.  

That was fiction, but the sinking of two 200-ton whalers, the Essex in 1821 and the Ann Alexander in 1851, by an enraged sperm whale was not.  Indeed it was these two incidents that inspired Herman Melville to write his epic novel Moby Dick in 1851.  

The sperm whale is the largest of the toothed whales and dives deeper than any other. The males measure up to 65 feet in length and weigh about 50 tonnes.

The sperm whale's spermaceti organ. Click to enlargeIt gets its name from a huge bulbous organ, a kind of forehead, called the spermaceti that sits above and protrudes beyond its upper jaw (click on the thumbnail to view the image full size).  It contains an insoluble, non-putrefying, milky wax which early whalers likened to sperm fluid.  Today, it is employed mostly in ointments, cosmetics and fine candles, but used to be the waterproofing medium for oilskins.

Biologists in the University of Utah recently concluded that the spermaceti actually evolved to be a weapon, a battering ram, in male-male aggression over access to females.  It was this aggression combined with this tool that sank the three ships, and caused damage to many others.  Nevertheless, it is also the cause of its near-extinction by whalers in the 19th century who highly prized the milky wax and blubber it contained, and hunted it without mercy until anti-whaling covenants were first signed in 1935.  Even so, low-level whaling continued until a general moratorium took effect in 1986, which Norway and Japan continue however to flout.  

Which brings me to the blob.  Remember that huge, pinkish-grey, blob of slimy, gelatinous, hard-to-cut tissue 40 feet long and resembling a squashed Elephant-sized blob on a beach elephant, found on a  beach in Chile, 680 miles south of Santiago ?
(Click on the thumbnail)

It had either dropped from the sky (Martians ?) or come out of the Pacific Ocean.  Many thought it might be an Octopus Giganteus, or Globster, which was recorded for the first and only time on a Florida beach in 1896, and which has confounded experts ever since.  

Well, chunks of the blob were sent for identification to specialists in France, the United States and Santiago.  

And it’s the Chilean researchers, at Santiago’s Museum of Natural History, that have solved the mystery.  They have concluded that it is, in fact, part of the carcass of a sperm whale, specifically the spermaceti.

When a sperm whale dies at sea, it rots until it becomes a skeleton suspended in a semi-liquid mass within a bag of skin and blubber,the scientists said, holding their noses. Eventually, the skin tears and the bones sink while the skin and blubber float.  Washed up on shore, the stuff has the appearance of an octopus (or elephant) because the spermaceti organ keeps its bulky shape and does not rot.  

So there you have it.  Literature, history, science, current affairs and a mystery solved, all in one short article. 

Back to Index

When Bigshots Try to Hide

Letters to the press, be it in Ireland, UK or elsewhere, periodically recount frustration on the part of ordinary citizens when they try to ask questions of bashful civil servants or shop managers or other such service-provider bosses.  We’ve all experienced something similar.  Most recently, Audrey Dillon in the (subscription-only) Irish Times relates her repeated and fruitless phone calls and letters to the civil service seeking some simple information.

Here is my sister Frances’ proven method to get results.

bullet

Pack into a small bag a newspaper, a thick novel, a pack of sandwiches and a thermos flask of coffee.  

bullet

Arrive at the office of the person you wish to see at 9 am sharp.  

bullet

When told he/she is busy or not arrived yet, smile sweetly, say you’re happy to wait and take a seat.  

bullet

Get out your newspaper, pour yourself a cup of coffee and wait patiently and politely.  
bullet

Have a sandwich if you’re hungry.  

bullet

Read the book when you’ve finished the paper.  

bullet

Stand up expectantly and cheerily every time someone enters or leaves your quarry’s office.  

I guarantee that before 5 pm the person you are seeking will have cracked.  He/she will see you.  It always works.  

And if it doesn’t, simply repeat the procedure the next day.  

Back to Index

Sex and the Cybersquatter

I happened to hear an interview on Ireland’s Today FM radio station last week (18th July) with a Californian entrepreneur called Gary Kremen.  

With great foresight, he had acquired the domain-name sex.com back in 1994.  

But he didn’t make immediate use of it because at the same time he also acquired match.com and used it set up an online dating agency which turned out to be highly successful, having brokered 20,000 marriages up to now.  (That’s why he calls himself history’s greatest match-maker).  

Now there are lots of nasty and nefarious things you can do to a website - crack it, hijack it, black it out - but one thing you can’t do, no matter how evil your intention, is steal its domain name.  Except you can.  

For in 1995, convicted fraudster Stephen Michael Cohen managed to steal sex.com using forged documents, and wasted no time in using it to set up his own website.  

His business idea was that most people looking for sex on the internet will type in the word sex which will more than likely bring them to sex.com.  The site then provided links to various pornographic sites which paid Mr Cohen handsomely - up to $1m per month - for the referrals.  The payment method is per click, usually between 5 and 15 cents, so he must have been generating around 5,000 clicks an hour, round the clock.  

When Mr Kremen found out about this cyber-squatting”, he set about chasing Mr Cohen through the California courts.  He eventually won, but it cost him six long years and $4.4 million in legal fees before the appeals process was finally exhausted last month.  

He was awarded a massive $65 million in lost revenue and damages, whereupon Mr Cohen understandably disappeared, apparently to Tijuana in Mexico, with his ill-gotten loot safely stashed in Jersey, the Isle of Man, Liechtenstein and such like banking havens.  Mr Kremen, who wants his $65m, is offering a reward of $50,000, which he said is readily negotiable upwards, to anyone who can find the fugitive and get him arrested.  

Why he went on to an obscure Irish radio station with all this I have no idea, unless he has a hunch that Mr Cohen is roaming around Ireland.   I’ll be keeping my eyes open.  

Meanwhile, Mr Kremen says he has revamped sex.com into a “more moral” service providing links only to “more wholesome” pornographic sites than those featuring the sadists, children and animals apparently favoured by Mr Cohen.  Hmmm. 

Salaciousness apart, it is a landmark case.  For it has established that a domain-name is in law a piece of property, whose owner has similar rights to a bricks-and-mortar landlord.  

So, hands off tallrite.com please.  

Back to Index

Quote of the Week

Quote : [The] theory ... that we need to balance the power of America with other competitive powers ... is an anachronism to be discarded ... If Europe and America split ... nothing but mischief will be the result ... To be a serious partner Europe must defeat the anti-Americanism that sometimes passes for its political discourse ... [But] don’t give up on Europe.

Anywhere, any time ordinary people are given the chance to choose, the choice is the same : 

bullet

freedom, not tyranny; 

bullet

democracy, not dictatorship; 

bullet

the rule of law, not the rule of the secret police.

Tony Blair addressing both houses of the US Congress 
on Thursday 17th July 2003

Back to Index

SEE THE ARCHIVE BAR AT THE TOP LEFT, FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE

ISSUE #46 - 13th July 2003 [133]

bulletFuel Shortage in a Land of Oil
bulletGeldof on Africa
bulletUS Casualties in Iraq vs Industry
bulletSaddam Invites Hypocrisy
bulletUS Democrats and Atheism
bulletTime to Reinvest in the Stockmarket
bulletGoogling to Weapons of Mass Destruction
bulletQuote of the Week

Fuel Shortage in a Land of OIl

Before civil war broke out in Nigeria in 1967, it was producing about one million barrels a day of oil.  War’s end in 1970 was followed by a frenetic round of oilfield activity - running seismic, drilling wells, building roads, constructing pumping stations, laying pipelines.  In about three short years this boom not only re-established the pre-war production rate but doubled it.  I know; I was there for all of it.  

Though production has remained at around 2 mb/d ever since, subsequent new discoveries have long meant that with sufficient investment it could double again to 4 mb/d.  But this has not happened because the Nigerian Government, which is a partner with oil companies in all production ventures, has been perennially unable or unwilling to pay its share of the necessary investment.  But that’s another story.  

Nigeria’s own oil consumption is 240,000 b/d; the capacity of its refineries twice that.  

Nigeria

Oh, and apart from oil, it exports 252.4 billion cubic feet a year of liquefied natural gas, which in energy terms is equivalent to another 120,000 b/d of oil.   

So, by any measure, there is