 |
| Blog |
 |
| Archive |
|
|
|
|
| Blog |
| To find an archived article, simply click on Index and scroll the subject titles, or do a Ctrl-F search |
TALLRITE BLOG
You can write to me at
blog2-at-tallrite-dot-com |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| “Ill-informed and Objectionable” Comment by an anonymous reader | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| For some reason, this site displays better in Internet Explorer than in Mozilla Firefox | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| August 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ISSUE #160 - 19th August 2007 [453+2143=2596]
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Last week's lead post was about illegality and immorality in Iraq. But what actually is “morality”?
Perhaps there are many more good acts you can do than bad ones, so it's easier to concentrate on the bad. However, I (unlike, evidently, God) am reminded of author Michael Losier's admonishment never [sic] to use the words “don't, not and no” because their negativity not only fails to convey what is actually required, but also draws attention to the unwanted. (Admit it - what picture does “Thou shalt not commit adultery” conjure up in your mind? Be honest!) But, returning to the bad stuff (that we all enjoy, in the movies at least, if not so much in real life), this seems to fall into two categories. Into the first category fall what I would call natural wrongs. These are things that “feel” intrinsically evil, regardless of your culture, religion or upbringing. I can't prove it, but I think there must be no groups of (sane) humans anywhere that think it is OK to steal from or kill other people within their own community on a whim. I mention “own community” and “whim” because these can often provide excuses or reasons to justify actions that would otherwise be considered wrong. For example,
Take away the excuse, and I very much doubt that the individual would consider the killing or stealing to be acceptable. Such natural wrongs don't seem to be very many in number. I reckon if I can only desist from killing, injuring, raping, robbing, defrauding and deceiving people, I can start living to a pretty high moral standard. The key determinant that makes these things wrong is one ingredient: other human beings. In every case they inflict harm, to varying degree, on another person. Maybe I should also put a stop to my habit of needlessly killing and injuring animals. This would certainly be virtuous, though I am not sure I would consider such acts to constitute “natural” wrongs (after all, foxes in chicken houses don't). Nevertheless, apart from the animal thing, I think we can all agree about the natural wrongs. But for many, including Christians, Jews and Muslims, the moral code extends equally to other matters. Well, just two other matters. The first is suicide. Is this a natural wrong? I don't think so. No-one is harmed but yourself (although your family will be pretty upset), but if you don't have the right to your own life, then who does? An intrinsic right to life surely includes a right to terminate it. And yet we all hate the idea. Certainly, from an evolutionary point of view it makes sense to abhor suicide, especially if you are of child-bearing/rearing age, as it damages the survival chances of your genes. But this is a dangerous argument, without a moral dimension, because it would then advocate raping any and every woman you could find in order to maximise your DNA propagation. Which brings me to the second other matter - sex. It's both right and wrong.
I could go on, but a couple of things stand out. Firstly, not everyone would agree with this list (no, really!). Secondly, assuming we're talking consensual adults, who - other than the cuckold's feelings - is getting hurt? Why, then, should any non-adulterous sex be classified as wrong? Or suicide? The answer is that there is no reason based on logic. Rather, one or both of two things intervene.
These agglomerations/religions then adopt a schedule of morality, “morality map” in my illustration, that proscribes not just those natural wrongs, but several other types of behaviour to be frowned upon. However they make no distinction between the natural wrong and the imposed wrong, and therein lies much of the confusion over what we call morality.
The source of morality, as we understand it, is a mixture of religion, culture and nature, of which religion claims the lion's share, followed closely by culture. But religion and culture are erroneous in preaching that they are the sole authors of morality, since they ignore the natural order that forbids certain wrongs. Indeed, as the Morality Map shows, they are obsessed with sex, and to a lesser extent suicide.
So what is morality? In the absolute sense it is sticking to the natural law, ie avoiding the natural wrongs. This is a code of conduct that applies universally, to atheists as much as theists, to wildmen in the jungles of Papua New Guinea as much as to sophisticates on the Champs-Elysées. Yet the additional sex and suicide morality imposed by cultural and religious norms have their place too. But that place is more to do with ensuring an orderly society that the majority of people feel comfortable living in. But breaking those taboos, if it doesn't harm another person, is not really “wrong” is it? A bit like parking in a no-parking zone.
Electricity and Money - An Iraqi's Solution “The Hammer” is the pseudonym (for security reasons) of a courageous Iraqi interpreter who has been working for several years with the American military. Journalist and blogger Michael Totten recently conducted an exclusive and heart-felt interview with him. It is fascinating on many levels to hear the words of a young Iraqi man so close to military operations, so aware of the calamitous state of his country, so in-tune with the thinking of his countrymen, so patriotic and so astute in recognizing that only the Americans can help. But two sets of observations particularly caught my eye. Knowing the way his people think and behave, he proposes two remarkably inventive solutions which he believes would go a long way towards pacification of his sorry country. Electricity and money. Here's how.
I wonder is anyone in the Bush administration picking up on these shrewd ideas. Read the whole fascinating interview for yourself. Then see whether you agree that such interpreters should be granted residency in the Coalition country they have served.
Anti-Smoking Nannies Escape from the Nursery Ireland introduced the world's first nation-wide indoor workplace smoking ban in 2004, and it has been an outstanding success, despite (or more likely because of) the lack of any exemptions whatsoever other than in prisons.
A major factor in its overwhelming acceptance is the way the ban was presented, as something to protect workers who hitherto had no choice but to inhale second hand fumes, rather than as a measure to improve public health. People respond to an appeal to help their neighbours, but instinctively dislike others telling to do something “because it's good for you”. Nannies should remain in the nursery. Some fifty countries in six continents have since introduced their own similar bans, to a greater or lesser extent, most recently England last July. But it has been notable how less scrupulous about presentation they have progressively become. By and large, the recent smoking bans have been unashamedly promulgated purely as a public health matter - to hell with the workers. As England's official website proudly proclaims, “A smokefree England ensures a healthier environment, so everyone can socialise, relax, travel, shop and work free from secondhand smoke”. And some places have gone further and even introduced outdoor smoking bans such as on beaches (Australia), patios (Canada), streets (Japan). Just last week, here in Ireland, I encountered an outdoor smoking ban at a hospital patio. With no pretence that this will improve anybody's health, it is just a bit of smoking fascism to promote a no-smoking ideology. Of course, the whiff of other people's cigarette smoke at the beach is offensive, but so is their boom-box blaring out the latest hits not to mention their barbecue because you're not invited, and no-one is talking about banning those. Now corporations are leaping onto the militant anti-smoking fascist bandwagon. For example,
Moreover, according to Mercer Human Resource Consulting, such companies are merely trailblazers for corporate bandwagons to follow in similar vein. Ireland's smoking ban will long be successful because of its appeal that we spare the health of downtrodden workers by not smoking in their workplace. In my view, those other, more robust, more ambitious approaches on the other hand, are doomed to failure, one way or another. There is bound to be some kind of backlash because people hate to be forced to do stuff, though they are very amenable to persuasion. I am reminded of Aesop's fable where, in a trial of strength, the Wind failed to remove through blustering force a traveller's cloak, whereas the Sun merely by shining hotly induced him willingly to remove it. The anti-smoking nannies have, it seems, escaped from the nursery after all. But for how long?
Week 160's Letter to the Press Just one letter this time, based on a post from last week. But I was not surprised it went unpublished as you're not supposed to make jokes about the Palestinians.
Quote: “I am astonished at those who are afraid of the people: one can always explain that what is in the interest of Europe is in the interests of our countries ... Britain is different. Of course there will be transfers of sovereignty. But would I be intelligent to draw the attention of public opinion to this fact?”
Jean-Claude Juncker, tiny Luxembourg's (pop
0.5m)
long-serving premier
When it comes to ideas above his station,
This is the same man
“If it's a Yes, we will say
‘on we go’,
Quote: “Is it fair to slaughter enemy spies?” Answer “Yes” From
“Military Teachings - for the Preparation of Mujahideen”,
Don't do jihad without it. Quote: “Scratch a liberal, find a dhimmhi”
Kathy Shaidle, Toronto author,
editor, writer and blogger, Quote: “[Chief Executive of Aer Lingus] Dermot Mannion can't come along on a bank holiday Monday and turn into a latter day Oliver Cromwell” ... “[it's an] Armageddon situation.”
Willie O'Dea, Ireland's laughable Minister
In Ireland,
Cromwell,
Armageddon is
the mythical final climactic battle
Supersize mammalia Jordan makes clear
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| See the Archive and Blogroll at top left and right, for your convenience | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ISSUE #159 - 12th August 2007 [484]
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Illegality and Immorality in Iraq I have found myself engaged in another tiresome and fruitless debate in the pages of the Irish Times about the illegality and immorality (or otherwise) of the war in Iraq, and I am left bemused, befuddled and of course outnumbered. There is a very large, noisy anti-war constituency in Ireland and many if not all other countries in the world. Why, in America, not only are a majority against the war but a whole political party, the Democrats, are devoted almost exclusively to this cause and are likely to win the next presidential election on the strength of it. At least in America, the anti-war crowd are (relatively) honest about it. They think America is losing, cannot win and so there is no point in expending further young lives and taxpayers' treasure. So what they want from America is withdrawal, which is a polite euphemism for retreat, which is a polite euphemism for defeat. What happens in Iraq after that doesn't concern or even interest them. Just as they couldn't have cared less about the South Vietnamese when they abandoned them in 1975, and so allowed Vietnam to become a Communist dictatorship that prevails to this day, and set the scene for the rape and genocide of next-door Cambodia by the Communists of the Khmer Rouge. Strange isn't it, how their desires line up precisely with those of the insurgents and jihadists within Iraq and everywhere else on the globe.
Outside America, the anti-war crowd have a slightly different focus. First and foremost their objective is the unequivocal defeat of George Bush. Then, it is the pubic humiliation of America. Everything else is secondary. Actually stopping a war from raging within Iraq does not feature anywhere, because not even they argue that withdrawal would be followed by the emergence of peaceful democratic politics in the mold of, say, New Zealand. The Protestant Archbishop of Dublin, John Neill, recently rambled,
This was quickly picked up in Ireland to mean that he was condemning the use of Shannon Airport not just for CIA rendition flights but for refuelling of US troop carriers to and from Iraq, which takes place on a daily basis. A case can certainly be made for keeping out rendition flights with their overtones of outsourced torture, but that was forgotten in the rush to embrace the archbishop as an anti-warrior who excoriates all use of Shannon by the US military (even though he restricted himself to rendition flights). An assortment of ex-MEPs and councillors from the Green Party jumped to congratulate the Archbishop for his “courageous” [sic!] criticism of the US military and to decry the complicity of the Irish Government, of which the Greens themselves are - ironically - a part, as well as the alleged silence of Catholic bishops. This was followed by standard boilerplate about American illegality, immorality, plus responsibility for half a million Iraqi deaths (no doubt culled from the Lancet's fraudulent claims). I then pointed out that to object to the current Iraq war was to disdain the (sainted) UN, under whose Resolution 1723 - unanimously approved at the request of the legitimate Iraqi prime minister - the Americans were fighting. Moreover, it is insurgents and jihadists, not the Americans, who are doing their best to kill innocent Iraqi children, women and men. The multinational forces are trying to protect them, in light of the 72% per cent of Iraqi adults who voted in December 2005 - in the face of enormous intimidation - for a new, democratic Iraq. Therefore, Ireland should be proud of its small contribution in making Shannon available to the brave American soldiers as they try to help the Iraqis. Those pursuing a policy of obstructionism should be ashamed of the additional loss of Iraqi life this could entail were they successful in thwarting the Americans. It was gratifying when these observations elicited a torrent of opprobrium, since this simply allowed me to expose further the venality of many Leftists' antiwar arguments.
I have transcribed the whole wretched debate here (wrong link now corrected). Sadly, you have to conclude that the white, liberal, “anti-war” movement, whether here in Europe or across the Atlantic, is so consumed with its hatred of Mr Bush, America, the West and indeed itself, that only a rampant global jihad, starting in Iraq, will make it feel vindicated. And to provide cover for this yearning for defeat and subjugation, they have to invert the meanings of words such as “illegality” and “immorality” as applied to Iraq. In the great scheme of things, we Europeans are irrelevant since we spend so little on our own defence, always assuming that when push comes to shove, the Great Satan will once again rescue us from death and destruction, as it did in the last century not twice but thrice (don't forget its Cold War victory). Therefore, we should be grateful that those in the US who inhabit the Vast Left Wing Conspiracy - to coin a phrase - don't (yet) have the reins of power. But let us fervently hope that in the likely event they do come to power in the not too distant future, the burden of executive responsibility, as opposed to the freedom of voluble rhetoric directed at the galleries of adoring fans, will exercise some restraint from their wilder impulses. That's you I'm talking to, Hilary.
John-Charles de Menezes, the 53rd Victim The British recently released a 142-page report into how London's Metropolitan Police Service mishandled the flow information to the public following the erroneous shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes on 22 July 2005. He was the unfortunate Brazilian whom police mistook for a suicide bomber and killed, following failed attacks the day before, which themselves followed successful jihadist attacks two weeks earlier, on the Double-Seventh. Those earlier attacks had murdered 52 innocents and injured or maimed a further 700. Tensions across the city were running high, the police were jumpy, their communications systems inadequate. So they chased Mr Menendez onto an underground train, thinking he was yet another bomber, and shot him seven times in the head before he could detonate himself. But, sadly, he turned out to be an innocent electrician going lawfully (albeit as an illegal immigrant) about his business. When the news of Mr de Menezes came out, 52 funerals and countless people still screaming in pain in hospital or learning they had lost limbs or were permanently crippled or disfigured, were instantly forgotten. The only story was the police cock-up; public outrage reserved solely for the men in blue. At least that was the hysterical storyline of the TV, newspapers and radio. The very next day, the police apologised for their fatal blunder, saying that “for somebody to lose [his] life in such circumstances is a tragedy and one that the Metropolitan Police Service regrets.” Yet two years later, with the issue of this latest report, the overwhelmingly Leftist media are still at it. Google “London Bombings”, and under News “Police slammed for Brazilian's killing” comes up as the secondmost headline. The broadsheets, tabloids, TV and radio can scarcely conceal their glee that the police have been caught doing something wrong, exacerbated by a bit of contemporaneous fibbing.
Of course it is perfectly correct to hold the police to account when they wrongfully kill someone and then dissemble about it. And it was, moreover, an unspeakable tragedy for young Mr de Menezes himself and his heartbroken family back in his Brazilian home village of Gonzaga. But where is the sense of perspective? No-one believes that the police deliberately set out to slaughter an innocent foreign tradesman. No-one seriously doubts that the police were in fact doing their best to thwart further fatal attacks and to catch the perpetrators, and prepared to risk their own lives to protect the general public. In such volatile circumstances as prevailed during July 2005, mistakes made in good faith would have been par for the course and should be accepted as such. Friendly fire, if you will. Be angry by all means. But direct the anger at the proper target. The people to be enraged about are not the police. It is the jihadists, who cold-bloodedly planned and carried out the attacks on 7th and 21st July, in the adolescent, sexually-perverted belief that Allah would reward them in heaven with the nookie they couldn't get on earth. They and their mentors need to be relentlessly tracked down and neutralised. Mr de Menenez was simply their 53rd victim. Those who joyously seek to blame the police for his death are in fact excusing the true murderers. They behave as if they would really rather the jihadists won the current war and just got on with their convert/enslave/kill agenda. Don't they realise that they themselves are already on the menu just like the rest of us? With the unbelievable brouhaha over one mistaken death (whilst ignoring the other 52), you once again have to wonder why the Left seem so keen for jihadists to win the current war
Diary of Botched 2007 UK Bombings Two years have passed since the jihadist events of July 2005 in London But, as someone once said in 1995 about different terrorists, they haven't gone away, y'know. And they won't, anytime soon. Their latest attempted outrages, thankfully botched, took place at the end of June 2007. Jihadists attempted to blow up London's Tiger Tiger nightclub on a Thursday evening, and it should have been no surprise to discover that this was the weekly Lady's Night. The victims were to be not just infidels, but infidel whores - a double whammy. But the car bomb never detonated. So shortly afterwards two of them drove a Jeep-bomb into the plate glass window of Glasgow Airport's main concourse, but so pathetically they couldn't even penetrate the glass. And then the cargo of gas-filled canisters also failed to blow up. So one of the Islamic would-be bombers, in best Buddhist tradition, poured petrol over himself and lit a match. Now, finally: click for the “true”, unexpurgated inside story about these attempts to do Allah's bidding in London and Glasgow, by their prime perpetrator and apparent “diarist”, Dr Khalid Ahmed. After the events, he took up residence at Scotland's Royal Alexander Hospital, where NHS infidels treated him for his self-inflicted 90% burns, at a taxpayer cost of £30,000 a day. But he succumbed to his injuries a week ago, which was a shame since he escaped forty years of incarceration. In the said must-read “diary”, he seemingly left one comment which was particularly apposite and rueful: “Well, that didn't work out so great”. Hattip: Mark Humphrys
Early this month, the Russians
told us they had launched a couple of mini submarines with manipulator
arms, through a hole in the ice not far from the
North Pole, and sent them down 4,261 metres to the seabed. There,
somewhere close to the Pole, they said they had planted a Russian flag, made
of indestructible titanium. Then, providing a photo as
“evidence”,
they announced they were
The main attraction seems to be that expert bodies, such as the US Geological Survey, have estimated that the Arctic region contains a quarter of the world's undiscovered oil and gas reserves, along with huge amounts of gold, tin, platinum and nickel, not to mention fish. Meanwhile, global “warmmongers” are saying that Arctic ice is steadily melting, which would make such resources easier to access. Now of course, nobody really knows whether the Ruskies are telling the truth about their derring-do and the photo could have been snapped anywhere. They could just as easily be launching the story for a bit of divilment and/or muscle-flexing. Nevertheless, the event brought forth a lot of bluster (see quote below) and hot air from Canada and the US, which also border the North Pole, but they clearly don't know what to do about it. Doing nothing may well result in Russia's claim being in due course accepted on a de-facto basis, which would doubtless be followed by a rush by the remaining bordering states to claim their respective pieces. And the UN will provide the rubber stamp. This could raise an interesting legal situation with a precedent extending well beyond the frozen, watery, peopleless, barren north. As far, in fact, as certain sweltering, arid, populated, often blooming deserts. In the Middle East for example. For if, by simply staking a claim to a piece of ground on the basis of statelessness and a flag, a UN state can acquire that soil as part of its own sovereign territory, it would be hard to deny Israel the same courtesy in the stateless West Bank. So if ever the Palestinians had a case to accelerate the creation in the West Bank and Gaza of their own second state (after Jordan), it should be the thought that the West Bank may have, thanks to Russian antics, potentially become fair game for any member of the UN with a Star of David flag, titanium or otherwise, and a camera. But of course who, in that seething hotbed of anti-Semitic vitriol known as the UN, is ever going to allow what many of them fondly describe as the “pigs and apes” to get away with any such thing? Certainly not the Russians.
Week 159's Letters to the Press Three letters this time, of which two to the Irish Times about Iraq, were published, as part of a heated exchange (which, naturally, I think I won). They are also the subject of this week's lead post.
Quote: “Of course I identify with Christian values but what have those got to do with going to bed with a prostitute? This is a private matter. Are you saying that I cannot be ... a good husband just because ... I had a little adventure?”
Cosimo Mele, of Italy's Christian Democrat UDC party,
The Sixth Commandment,
The Eighth Commandment, Quote: “This isn't the 15th century. You can't go around the world and just plant flags and say ‘We're claiming this territory’,”
Canadian Foreign Minister Peter MacKay gets upset See also my own comment above. Quote: “He's a completely normal five-year-old. Yet he's completely obsessed with the game at the minute, he loves it.”
Mark Quinn of the Irish
Chess Union,
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
